The Merchan clown show intensifies in New York

Featured

Valid points about the “Stormy Daniels” testimony

There are a number of considerations that the main-stream press has ignored about the testimony given by Stephanie Gregory Clifford (aka “Stormy Daniels”) and the resulting actions of Judge Juan Merchan:

  • Her testimony has nothing to do with the charges levelled by Alvin Bragg.
  • The judge had no reason to allow the testimony.
  • The only reason that the judge would have included this testimony was to create a prejudice (as if it did not already exist within this jury of New York Democrats) against President Trump. Instead, Judge Merchan should have:
    • Called both legal teams to the bench.
    • Pointed out how close to the the legal line the testimony was getting.
    • Instructed the jury to disregard that portion of the testimony.
  • Instead, Judge Merchan sent the jury out while he repremanded the prosecution. Why not let the jury know that the prosecution had seriously overstepped its bounds?
  • Problem is, this testimony had nothing to do with how something was filed or how President Trump could have shown himself to be trying to break campaign finance law some 18 years ago.
  • Still, the jury was then instructed to “ignore the testimony of Stephanie Clifford (aka “Stormy Daniels”).
  • Next, the judge blames the defense lawyers for “not protesting enough” in regard to this testimony.

However, we also have to remember that this is the judge who:

  • Contributed to the campaigns of both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
  • Has a daughter who makes millions by representing and writing communications for Adam Schiff and Maxine Waters
  • Could have allowed this to go to another New York judge
  • Allowed Alvin Bragg to keep his witness list secret from the defense (constituting a Brady violation)

A case of Democrat corruption being reflected and reported against a conservative

Featured

President Trump’s “impeachment whistleblower” was involved in the Biden/Ukraine affairs

Paul Sperry of RealClearInvestigations has dug into a number of open documents and found improprieties just waiting for an honest journalist to expose.

The ‘whistleblower’ who sparked Donald Trump’s first impeachment was deeply involved in the political maneuverings behind Biden-family business schemes in Ukraine that Trump wanted probed, newly obtained emails from former Vice President Joe Biden’s office reveal.

In 2019, then-National Intelligence Council analyst Eric Ciaramella touched off a political firestorm when he anonymously accused Trump of linking military aid for Ukraine to a demand for an investigation into alleged Biden corruption in that country.

But four years earlier, while working as a national security analyst attached to then-Vice President Joe Biden’s office, Ciaramella was a close adviser when Biden threatened to cut off U.S. aid to Ukraine unless it fired its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. At the time, the corruption-riddled energy giant was paying Biden’s son Hunter millions of dollars.

(continued)

Ciaramella’s role – including high-level discussions with top Biden aides and Ukrainian prosecutors – is only now coming to light thanks to the recent release of White House emails and photos from the National Archives.

The emails show Ciaramella expressed shock – “Yikes” is what he wrote – at Biden’s move to withhold the $1 billion in aid from Kyiv, which represented a sudden shift in U.S. policy. They also show he was drawn into White House communications over how to control adverse publicity from Hunter taking a lucrative seat on Burisma’s board.

(continued)

Ciaramella worked under CIA Director John Brennan when President Obama made Biden his point man on Ukraine in 2014, the same year Burisma hired Hunter. The next year, the CIA detailed Ciaramella, a longtime advocate for aid to Ukraine, to the White House, where he worked closely with Biden and his staff as a top adviser on key Ukrainian policies. After Biden left office, he stayed on at the GOP White House until mid-2017 even though he’s a Democrat, working as a Ukrainian and Russian analyst on Trump’s National Security Council. Co-workers there accused him of trying to sabotage Trump, including allegedly leaking sensitive information to the press.

(continued)

White House visitor logs confirm Ciaramella escorted Shokin’s deputy prosecutor, David Sakvarelidze, into the White House for a January 2016 meeting. A White House agenda for the meeting lists Ciaramella as “point of contact” for the Ukrainian delegation. He also checked in Andriy Telizhenko, the Ukrainian Embassy official who says they discussed Burisma and Hunter Biden during the meeting and struggled to understand why his U.S. counterparts were suddenly hostile to Shokin after praising him in earlier talks.

(continued)

On Jan. 21, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt emailed Ciaramella and other White House aides an article from the Ukrainian press – “U.S. loan guarantee conditional on Shokin’s dismissal.”

“Yikes. I don’t recall this coming up in our meeting with them,” Ciaramella replied, referring to the White House meeting he hosted with top Ukrainian prosecutors.

(Read the entire and worthwhile article at RealClearInvestigations)

Blogging is just a hobby to me; however, I still want to ask a few questions about this.

Unlike professional journalists, my daily time as a blogger gets limited to a hour or so before my workday (and maybe a half-hour or little more during my lunch and precious little time in the evening).

Nonetheless, when I look at this article, a set of questions come to mind:

  • If someone accusing the current president worked hand-in-glove with the opposition party’s vice president, might that not cause most to take that person’s otherwise unsubstantiated testimony with a grain of salt?
  • How is it that every Democrat “whistleblower” starts out by citing disprovable allegations against conservatives, but those allegations are built on kernels of truth that lead back to Democrats? For example, Ciaramella “blew the whistle” on a purported phone call between President Trump and the Ukrainian president where Ciaramella accused Trump of asking that Biden be investigated. Since Ciaramella had worked as a national security analyst to Joe Biden, surely he knew of Biden’s threat to cut of U.S. aid to Ukraine unless the Ukrainians fired their top prosecutor (who was investigating Burisma Holdings, employer of Hunter Biden to the tune of millions of dollars).
  • If not for the power of Joe Biden’s control over what aid went to Ukraine, why did both the Obama administration and the Ukrainian government turn on Shokin after Joe Biden’s threat to cut off U.S. aid?
  • Since Ciaramella has a history with the CIA (which Chuck Schumer noted as being advisaries who “have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you”), could this be an extension of the “Russia collusion hoax” (which, although primariy implemented through the FBI, had some CIA and foreign intelligence elements)?
  • Why was Ciaramella so surprised by the action of Joe Biden as to respond with “Yikes?”

According to the NYTwits, it’s not Biden’s economy or observed inequity in the law that helps President Trump

Featured

According to the NYTwits, it is nostalgia that helps President Trump

The New York Times ignores a lot of the obvious negative contributions by the Biden regime has thrown onto the electoral fire and tries to heap the positives going for President Trump into a “nostalgia” heap.

A new poll by The New York Times and Siena College finds that voters think highly of the former president’s record on the economy, but memories of his divisiveness largely remain intact.

The poll’s findings underscore how a segment of voters now recall the Trump years as a time of economic prosperity and strong national security.

Views of Donald J. Trump’s presidency have become more positive since he left office, bolstering his case for election and posing a risk to President Biden’s strategy of casting his opponent as unfit for the presidency, according to a new poll by The New York Times and Siena College.

While the memories of Mr. Trump’s tumultuous and chaotic administration have not significantly faded, many voters now have a rosier picture of his handling of the economy, immigration and maintaining law and order. Ahead of the 2020 election, only 39 percent of voters said that the country was better off after Mr. Trump took office. Now, looking back, nearly half say that he improved things during his time as president.

The poll’s findings underscore the way in which a segment of voters have changed their minds about the Trump era, recalling those years as a time of economic prosperity and strong national security. The shift in views about his administration comes even as Mr. Trump faces dozens of felony counts and will appear in a New York courtroom on Monday for jury selection in one of his four criminal trials.

(Read more at the New York Times)

If prosperity and security are not reasons enough to vote for a guy, why not look beyond that to the other reasons?

While prosperity and security are driving reasons, why not also consider the fact that President Trump did not have transexuals on the White House lawn baring their breasts?

Alternately, why not consider the chaos that Joe Biden has promoted in his transgender policy?

On the international front, why not consider the weakness that this hardly-animated corpse has projected for the rest of America?

I have a question for the Biden apologists: Are the continual one-word messages of “Don’t” proof of Biden’s dementia?

In 2022, Biden issues a short “warning” to Putin over the possibility of his use of chemical or nuclear weapons: “Don’t”

The Moscow Times picked up a 17 September 2022 article by the Agence France-Presse covering Biden’s first monosyllabic “warning” to entities actually in control of their faculties.

U.S. President Joe Biden is warning his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin against using chemical or tactical nuclear weapons in the wake of serious losses in his war in Ukraine.

“Don’t. Don’t. Don’t,” Biden said, in an excerpt from an interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes” aired Friday evening.

Biden was responding to an interviewer’s question about the possibility of Putin, whose army is incurring heavy losses in the Ukraine counteroffensive this month, resorting to chemical or tactical nuclear weapons.

(Read more at the Moscow Times)

In 2023, Biden tells Hezbollah and its backer, Iran (who he funds with pallets of cash) “Don’t”

Britian’s alternative news Sky News provides a stark view of the impaired leader’s warning as it quotes Joe’s empty words to Iran.

The US president said his message to Iran, which has threatened to take military action against Israel, was simply ‘don’t’. He added, ‘we will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed.’

(See the video version of this weak warning at Sky News)

Rather than issuing these weak warnings, why doesn’t the regime take measures to withhold money from Iran?

The Biden regime has enriched Iran by allowing China and other nations to trade with Iran for its oil without suffering sanctions from America or its allies.

Additionally, Joe Biden has unfrozen $6 billion in one instance and another $10 billion to Qatari banks.
Furthermore, as the tweet below illustrates, the people in the Biden regime have taken no interest in tracking how Iran spends the money that Biden sends it.

We are seeing Biden’s destruction of America

Featured

Eleven ways Biden and his handlers are hell-bent on destroying America

The following article at Fox News posted by Victor Davis Hanson outlines the eleven fronts of desctruction accomplished by the Biden regime against America.  I take up the first six.

Why are those controlling President Biden using him to advance so much of a destructive agenda that it will likely end America as we know it?

If someone wished to destroy America, could he do anything more catastrophic than what we currently see and hear each day?

What would an existential enemy do that we have not already done to ourselves?

Here are 11 now familiar steps to civilizational destruction:

  1. Wipe out a 2,000-mile border.

Allow 10 million foreign nationals to enter unlawfully. Have no audit of any; nullify all federal immigration laws. Let in toxic drugs that kill 100,000 Americans a year. Give free support to those millions who broke the law. Smear any objectors as racists and xenophobes.

  1. Run up $35 trillion in national debt.

Keep adding $1 trillion to it each 100 days. Defame anyone wishing to cut wild spending as cruel and inhumane.

  1. Appease or subsidize enemies like Iran and China.

Demonize allies like Israel. Allow terrorists to attack Americans without adequate response. See Islam as either similar or superior to Christianity. Make amends to leftist governments for supposedly past toxic American international behavior. Follow the lead of international agencies like the U.N., ICC and WHO to atone for past American neocolonial and imperialist behavior. Recede to second-tier international status, befitting American decline.

  1. In a multiracial democracy, redefine identity only as one’s tribal affiliation.

Ensure each identity group rivals the other for victimhood and the state spoils it confers. Reboot all political issues by race and sex oppressors and oppressed. Destroy all meritocratic standards of admission, retention, promotion and commendation.

  1. Recalibrate violent crime as understandable, cry-of-the-heart expressions of social justice.

Ensure no bail and same-day release for arrested, repeat violent felons. Empathize with the violent killer and rapist; ignore their victims, especially if they are slain police officers.

  1. Emasculate the military by using non-meritocratic standards of race, gender, and sexual orientation to determine promotion and commendation.

Deliberately impugn as racists and insurrectionists the largest demographic in the military who in recent wars died at twice their numbers in the population — so that they leave or never join the military. Encourage retired high officers to slander their commander-in-chief. Cut the defense budget. Stop producing sufficient weapons, but leave billions of dollars’ worth of arms to terrorists.

(Read the final five points at Fox News)

The thing is that this is not only seen from the vantage point of America. One Brazilian also sees it.

Oddly, at least as allowed by Google searches, nobody reported on the words of a young Brazilian politician Nikolas Ferreira who expressed his concerns of the influence of liberal trends in Brazil and the United States before the United Nations. Following is my transcription of the first half of his speech:

I was born in a poor neighborhood in my city, Bizon, Brazil. I am married. I am Christian. And we are expecting a daughter, Aura, who will be born in three months.

I became the most voted federal congressman in Brazil and I am here to warn you about what is happening in my country.

I apologize if I make any mistakes in my speech. I am still learning English.

The Left returned to power in the presidencies of Brazil ths year, but it has had the power of the universities, media, and culture for decades.

America is like a body and its health is like a tripod: patriotism, morality, and spirituality. If someone undermines these three areas, America will collapse from within. Stalin said this. They have known the secret for a long time and have used all possible means to achieve their goal of the destruction of the family. But you may wonder “Wouldn’t that be too radical of an idea? Does anyone really want to do this? And, after all, how would they do that?”

First, they destroy the sense of reality. There is no wrong. There is no right and wrong, no good or bad. Everything is relative. Why then, say that men exist? Why say women aren’t? Concepts get abolished.

Then they move to stage number two: the destruction of identity. If you are nothing, then everything can be everything. Therefore, they will destroy your identity as a person. Young people no longer know what or who they are and are carried away by any wind of doctrine and cling to what is fashionable. They tell you to dress like this and use this type of language and, finally, live like this. It is the generation most lacking in good references that have ever existed. (After all, the Left replaced Jesus with a Black Lives Matter activist and exchanged the Cross — which represents injustice against an innocent — for symbols that represent nothing other than the selfishness of activism itself.)

By the way, the rainbow is not yours, but ours. Read the Bible and you will find out.

Also, beauty no longer exists. The focus is on shocking — whether in fashion, music, films, and TV series — the important thing is to sell a culture that delivers everything you want (except meaning of life).

Slaves to their own will, a generation that cannot handle pain or confrontation (much less being told what is wrong), who exchange their parents advices for teachers who never carried them in their arms (who commit the strange actions of those who are dominating them) — these are too foolish to know they are being used and who uses them. Like those who campaign for abortion, but ignore that (75 years ago) the universal Declaration of Human Rights was published — which, in its third article states “everyone has the right to life.”

(Holding up a two-inch model of a unborn human.) This is a 12-week-old baby. His or her heart is already beating. It has a fingerprint. There is no one in the world like this baby.

We are additionally seeingthis destruction through the stories not reported by the main stream press

Michigan Democrats fail to condemn “Death to America” chants in their borders

The Daily Caller points out both the silence of the press along with the silence of Governor Gretchen “the Wretch” Whitmer and Representative Rashida Tlaib.

A number of Democratic elected officials in Michigan failed to condemn “Death to America” chants made at an Al Quds Day Rally in Dearborn, Michigan, late last week.

An activist named Tarek Bazzi spoke to the crowd at the rally calling for “all of” the crowd’s chants and shouts to be directed at America. The protesters can be heard chanting, “Death to America” in a video posted on social media.

“The death to Israel is the most logical chant heard across the world, today,” said Bazzi in the video. After Bazir’s remarks, Michigan Imam Usama Abdhulagani said to the crowd, “Israel is an evil settler-colonial State.”

“Israel is ISIS,” continued Abdhulagani.

The Daily Caller contacted Democrats from Michigan’s Congressional delegation, along with Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, to ask if they condemned the chant. A number of them responded with condemnations, but several did not, including Whitmer and Rep. Rashida Tlaib.

(Read more at the Daily Caller)

We will see ice storms in July for Houston, Texas before Joe Biden, Gretchen Whitmer, or Rashida Tlaib criticizes an Islamic extremist

There are a number of hot places that would first freeze over before that set (Joe Biden, Gretchen Whitmer, or Rashida Tlaib) would chance say something against Islam.

When on the road in Michigan, Biden said “The most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy.”

Michigan CBS affiliate WWMT reported in a 15 March 2023 article how Joe Biden estimated White supremacy to be the greatest threat to America.

President Joe Biden over the weekend addressed what he calls the biggest threat to the United States: white supremacy.

So, how worried is the government about that threat and what, if anything, does it mean in the 2024 race for the White House?

“The most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy.,” Biden said while addressing a graduation ceremony at Howard University. “I’m not saying this because I’m at a black HBCU. I say it wherever I go.”
President Joe Biden over the weekend addressed what he calls the biggest threat to the United States: white supremacy.

So, how worried is the government about that threat and what, if anything, does it mean in the 2024 race for the White House?

“The most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy.,” Biden said while addressing a graduation ceremony at Howard University. “I’m not saying this because I’m at a black HBCU. I say it wherever I go.”

(Read more at CBS)

Just as Joe maintains President Trump threatens democracy, he also has not stepped back from calling “White supremacy” a threat to America

In fact, just this week, Biden called Trump the “primary threat to freedom and democracy at home” (all while Joe’s White House has met with every prosecutor working cases against President Trump).

Teen arrested by the FBI for allegedly plotting to attack churches in name of ISIS

CBS News reports in a 9 April 2024 article on the arrest of 18-year-old Alexander Mercurio who planned to kill churchgoers in his town in the name of ISIS.

An 18-year-old from Idaho was arrested Saturday and accused of plotting to kill churchgoers in his town in the name of ISIS, according to court documents unsealed Monday.

Alexander Mercurio was charged in a criminal complaint with providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization. He remains in custody and has not entered a plea, according to court records.

Investigators alleged Mercurio was about to attack at least one church in his area on April 7 — a Sunday — with guns, knives, and flammable chemicals, but they said they foiled his plans before he could carry out his plan.

Mercurio is accused of writing to an unnamed FBI source that he was set to “stop close by the church, equip the weapon(s) and storm the temple, killing as many people as possible.” His goal, according to investigators, was to carry out an act of martyrdom before the end of Ramadan — the holy month observed peacefully by Islam practitioners across the globe that emphasizes prayer and fasting — and pledge his allegiance to the leader of ISIS.

“I am going to perform a martyrdom operation very soon,” he allegedly wrote in one recent message. “The targets will be the various churches in my town.”

In the newly-released court documents, prosecutors described an evolution of beliefs beginning in 2022 when messages and posts allegedly revealed the teenager’s interest in ISIS and his parents’ apparent dissatisfaction with his religious beliefs. He stored media on his electronic devices including a jihadi chant, investigators said, and posted pro-ISIS material online.

Court documents revealed Mercurio also allegedly told members of a terror-affiliated group chat that he had previously been in contact with an individual who was later arrested for providing financial support to the terrorist group.

(Read more at CBS News)

Luckily, the FBI caught this guy before he joined Black Lives Matter or Antifa

If Mercurio had joined either BLM or Antifa, the FBI likely would never had caught him. Instead, the Biden staff would have contributed to his cause.

Let’s get back to America first when it comes to our ranking

Featured

The old claim that “Illegals do the jobs Americans won’t do” has proven false.

Although I admit I got the bulk of this post from the Daily Caller‘s Mark Meckler, I am sure we have seen the proofs that both Mr. Meckler and the Heritage Foundation found. Still, to quote Mr. Meckler:

 I am weary of hearing the trope that we need more illegal aliens because “Americans won’t work those jobs.” My bet is that most Americans share this sentiment as well.

Amidst a myriad of concerns about illegal immigration, one prominent worry among Americans is the potential adverse effects on the U.S. workforce. There is apprehension that undocumented migrants could potentially displace native-born workers, leading to job loss and further exacerbating the nation’s tax burden. The media and the left love to dismiss such considerations as fearful, xenophobic, and bigoted, arguing instead that alien workers fill a vital gap in the American workforce. But these concerns, nevertheless, are valid.

To argue that the American people refuse to work jobs that must alternatively be filled by undocumented workers is nothing less than a slanderous attack against the natives of this country. Americans will work these jobs… when the pay rates go to market rates and are not depressed by illegal-alien rates.

In 2016, the year that President Donald Trump took office, the Heritage Foundation published a study showing that, “other than [a] small number of scientifically educated immigrants, immigration produces little or no overall economic gain for non-immigrants but may cause a substantial shift in income from workers to business and capital owners. Also, immigrants overall produce a fiscal deficit due to the very large inflow of legal and illegal immigrants with low education levels in recent decades.”

The argument, according to Heritage, contends that “a disproportionate inflow of immigrant laborers at a particular education or skill level will reduce the wage of workers in that group relative to others. For example, adult immigrants are almost four times as likely as non-immigrants to lack a high school diploma. This will result in persistently lower relative wages for less skilled workers, whether immigrant or not.”

Put differently, the issue isn’t that Americans are unwilling to take on these jobs; rather, it’s that employers prefer to hire undocumented immigrants who are willing to accept lower wages. While this might not pose a significant problem with minimal illegal immigration (as there wouldn’t be a substantial migrant population to impact the job market), the situation changes drastically when millions of undocumented individuals enter the country unlawfully within a few short years.

Repeatedly, businesses and policymakers have forsaken their responsibilities to the American populace and the principles of “America first” by favoring easy profits or lax immigration policies. Between actions such as offshoring factories, saturating the market with inexpensive labor, and subsidizing Americans’ failure to work through overly generous welfare programs, American society appears to favor foreigners over its own citizens, contradicting the government’s primary allegiance to “We the People.”

(Read the closing paragraphs at the Daily Caller)

As a nation, we need to honor God

Honoring the God of the Bible will involve some sacrifice on our parts; however, those sacrifices are to be directed by God and made by us. To rephrase that, free Americans seeking to honor God need to be unencumbered by a government who would force the world on them.

And it seems that forcing the world on us is the aim of Joe Biden. Correct me where I have strayed from the truth on this if you can find a point where Joe is doing something else.

Don’t get me wrong. Many of the people who Joe Biden has brought in might be usually moral people. However, the first thing they did upon entering this nation was to break our immigration laws.

I look forward to your responses.

If Biden is creating the liberal utopia, why all the subterfuge (continued)

Featured

Biden ties support for Israel to civilian protection in Gaza

The Wall Street Journal shines a light on the strings that Joe Biden has tied to his support of Israel.

President Biden warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday that future U.S. support hinges on protecting civilians and aid workers in Gaza, signaling for the first time that the White House would reassess backing Israel’s war in the enclave.

In a phone call, Biden demanded an immediate cease-fire in Gaza and urged Netanyahu to empower his negotiators to conclude a deal to bring Israeli hostages home, according to a White House statement. The call came days after Israel killed seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen in what Netanyahu has described as a tragic mistake.

(Read at more at the Wall Street Journal)

If this works for Joe, I remember someone who pulled out of Afghanistan, causing a cascading series of deaths

When Joe pulled out of Afghanistan, leaving the people who had worked with the U.S. during the decades-old war to get out on their own, he started a cascading series of deaths in the area.

Of course, the one that the people of America will likely remember is that of the 13 soldier’s lost lives due to the suicide bombing at the Kabul airport. When we look at incident, we could ask “Why did we abandon a military airport in the country for a civilian airport in the city?” However, that would be as fruitless as climbing on the outside of an air transport.

Speaking of which, the largly symbolic “evacuation” of Kabul removed only a miniscule fraction of those who had worked closely with the Western allies against the Taliban. The numbers who perished in this (along with the numbers slaughtered by the Taliban) will likely never be known.

Additionally, after pulling out, Joe sent a drone strike against a car that turned out to be a family fleeing

Since Joe seems so intent on minimizing deaths among the Islamic population abroad right now, he didn’t seem to take the time to consider the effect of his own actions when he killed an Afghan family of 10 in a drone strike as he tried to retailiate for the suicide bombing at the Kabul airport.

If the killing of civilians by the army commanded by Benjamin Netanyahu is reason enough to call for the removal of Netanyahu, why hasn’t anyone called for the removal of Joe Biden three times over as demonstrated by the paragraphs above?

If Biden is creating the liberal utopia, why all the subterfuge

Featured

Revealed: Biden is flying 320K illegal aliens to Texas, Florida, and California

The U.S. cities Biden is flying hundreds of thousands of migrants in controversial program that sparked national security fears

Britian’s Daily Mail lays open the program by Biden to fly illegals From Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela directly into Republican states or into states losing significant population due to Democrat policies.

The vast majority of migrant flights President Joe Biden‘s White House is transporting directly from foreign countries to U.S. airports to bypass the southern border are landing in Florida.

A new analysis from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) reveals that 326,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela arrived in Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis‘ state since the program started in January 2023.

Lawyers for Biden’s immigration agencies refused to disclose through a FOIA request data on which airports were receiving the undocumented migrants, claiming it would compromise safety and create national security ‘vulnerabilities.’

While the latest analysis reveals the eight cities with the highest number of arrivals, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) revealed last month that the flights landed in at least 43 different American airports from January through December 2023.

Texas already bears a large brunt of the migration crisis with thousands of illegal immigrants entering through the southern border every day. But the Lone Star State is also receiving the second-highest number of migrants through Biden’s flight program.

Through February, 21,964 undocumented migrants were flown to Houston since January last year. Nearly 13,000 were flown to California through the airports in either Los Angeles or San Francisco.

The remainder of the almost 15,000 other migrants who gained entry into the U.S. through this program during the time period arrived at airports in Boston, Massachusetts; Atlanta, Georgia; Baltimore, Maryland; and Chicago, Illinois.

The New York Field Office, which includes JFK and LaGuardia airports, logged 33,408 OFO encounters with inadmissible aliens from the chosen nationalities from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, Todd Bensman’s analysis notes.

(Read at the Daily Mail how Biden claims the CHNV program is not a cover-up, but doesn’t give details)

This program claims to have flown over 320K directly from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua into our cities, but it does not turn over its books to anyone else

It has long been said that sunlight is the best disinfectant. So, why not put this out into the daylight for all of us to see?

It would be interesting to see why Biden’s staff chose to send illegals from Cuba to Houston and Miami. Were they attempting to start a socialist cell in those red states?

Why did they send the numbers that they did to Los Angeles, Boston, and San Francisco? Were those bastions of liberalism losing so many conservatives that they might lose a representative or presidential elector?

Despite the claims of Joe Biden that Republicans are plotting the end of Medicare, his acts have crippled it.

Biden is destroying Medicare Advantage.

The National Review lays out the distructive acts of Joe Biden against the Medicare Advantage program.

In his State of the Union address, President Joe Biden exclaimed, “If anyone here tries to cut Social Security or Medicare or raise the retirement age, I will stop them!”

He failed to mention that there is a caveat: It doesn’t apply to Medicare Advantage.

Medicare Advantage (MA) is the program via which beneficiaries choose a private insurance plan to provide their Medicare benefits.

By April 1, the Biden administration will finalize what, on paper, looks like a 2.4 percent increase in funding for MA for 2025. But that increase won’t keep up with rising costs. Health care inflation is sure to grow this year, and the Medicare trustees project a 6 percent increase in Medicare costs for 2025. Thus, the payment for the MA will, in effect, amount to a 0.16 percent cut. That comes on top of a 1.12 percent cut for 2024.

It will be the MA beneficiaries who will suffer.

(Read more at the National Review)

The Democrats have gone all-out on abortion and been allowed to commit a self-inflicted genocide on the Black community with that program. Maybe those Democrats should call this selective abortion of the old.

The Democrats seem pretty good at packaging death and selling it to a willing population. Maybe they should try selling this.

Both political sides seem to be having all sorts of nightmares regarding elections.

Featured

The “Squad” seems to be having nightmares now.

Squad’s anti-Israel rhetoric spurs tough primary challenges.

The Washington Times points out the problem that the far-left “Squad” has made for themselves: they now have strong challenges that may might knock them out of their blue seats.

Members of Congress’ far-left “Squad” who have championed Palestinians in the Middle East conflict are in danger of losing their seats in Democratic primaries.

The efforts to remove Reps. Cori Bush of Missouri and Jamaal Bowman of New York have gained momentum with an influx of money from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and its political arm, the United Democracy Project.

AIPAC-connected organizations are expected to spend up to $100 million this election cycle, mainly on House races. That is four times the $26 million the United Democracy Project spent in the 2022 election cycle.

(Read more at the Washington Times)

Too bad for the conservative side that these challenges to the “Squad” don’t fall on the Republican side.

In a perfect world, the Squad would be replaced with conservative members of Congress that would never go to an enforced border to cry at an empty parking lot.

In that perfect world, there would be no Squad member advocating genocide and then trying to stupidly convince us that the call for genocide is peaceful.

It would not require a perfect world for Congress to act against a Squad member who tweets “It’s all about the Benjamins,” and then deletes the tweet.

And, as you know, this could go on for many paragraphs.

This is why they want RFK out of the race.

By using the allocation of electors allowed by Nebraska’s election law, a 269-269 split could go to the House.

Newsweek reports on why the swampiest of the RINO’s have retired in a period where they cannot be replaced: this might throw the House to the Democrats without a special election (and prior to November 2024 — where the Democrats could really deny an election).

Nebraska, a state Republican state, could cost former president Donald Trump the 2024 election against President Joe Biden, according to a conservative.

On March 12, Biden and Trump each won a series of primary elections to become their party’s presumptive presidential nominees. This focused attention on how the likely presidential election between the two rivals would play out.

While Biden’s approval rating and policies related to inflation, crime, immigration and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in Gaza have drawn consistent scrutiny from conservatives, the incumbent president has had a surge in recent polls. Eight separate polls published in March showed promising numbers for Biden, including leads or stalemates in consequential battleground states including Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan.

The polls give Biden a slight lead on a national basis ranging from one to three points, though it isn’t clear if it would give him an overall victory due to the Electoral College.

(Read more at Newsweek)

On the Democrat side, this does not work if there is a third-party candidate like RFK.

If RFK pulls several percentage points from Joe, this does not work.

Nonetheless, this is why the RINO’s are jumping ship at a time that their electorate cannot hold a special election and replace them. Representative Buck and Gallagher obviously have a plan to hand the House and the gavel over to Hakeem Jeffries so that he can perform real election denial.

Additionally, this is the reason that Joe is flooding the nation with now 12 million illegal aliens (who may or may not be allowed to vote, but will soon be counted in the census to determine representation in Congress).

When considering President Trump’s campaign, this does not work if conservatives sit at home.

If we do not get every last conservative voter out to vote (even if it involves going to the rest homes and dorms to get both ends of the conservative spectrum into the voting booth), we will be sunk.

Answer me this: why can’t the WH respond to Biden now using “bloodbath”

Featured

On one hand, it seems that the White House doesn’t want to draw attention to the extremity of Joe Biden’s hyperbole

Karine Jean-Pierre pushes back on Peter Doocy’s question as he presses her on Joe Biden useing the term “bloodbath”

The Daily Caller shines the spotlight on the Democrat hypocrisy demonstrated when Joe Biden used “bloodbath” (a word that the press took from a quote of President Trump’s on the auto industry and applied to the general election).

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre accused Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy of being “disingenuous” for asking about President Joe Biden’s use of the term “bloodbath.”

Former President Donald Trump came under intense scrutiny by the corporate media after he warned rally attendees in Ohio of a potential “bloodbath” in the auto industry if Biden wins re-election in 2024. Members of the media twisted his words by attempting to link them to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

“So when Donald Trump is talking about a bloodbath, it is violent rhetoric,” Doocy began during Tuesday’s briefing. “What was it when Joe Biden said in 2020, ‘what we can’t let happen is this primary become a negative bloodbath?’”

“So I’m gonna be really mindful and careful about Donald Trump, but if you read — because he is a candidate — we’re talking about the 2024 election — you should read what he said in its context. So you gotta read what he said in context —” Jean-Pierre began.

“I understand. Bloodbath is an ugly word when Trump used it. What is it when Biden uses it?” Doocy interjected.

(Read at the Daily Caller to see how KJP dances like a drunken sailor around Joe’s words)

So, in the case of Trump, the press took his words and created a verbally violent scene he never uttered.

In the case of President Trump, the press took his words on how the auto industry would be decimated by the continuance of Joe Biden’s green policies. Anyone who cannot think of buying a new car will back me up on the proposition that Joe Biden has done much to cripple America (and especially the auto industry).

In the case of Biden, he wanted to imply coming violence against him from a group when that group did no no provable violence

If we read Joe’s words “What we can’t let happen is let this primary become a negative bloodbath,” then the demented old guy could be talking about physical violence or just the verbal hashing out of differences. Nonetheless, since the press and Democrats throughout the nation took President Trump’s referral to a “bloodbath” to be a letting of blood between opposing sides, maybe we should apply that standard here.

Maybe every time Joe suggests a “bloodbath,” we should grab our bulletproof vests and treat him accordingly.

The White House staff sensitivity to the term “bloodbath” might be a response to murders tied to Joe’s border policy

Trump says he would “love” to see family of Ruby Garcia, 25-year-old allegedly killed by illegal migrant, at Michigan rally

One of the sad results of Joe’s open borders is that there are too many murders for a part time blogger to cover.

In addition to the murder of Laken Riley and too many other young Americans, the New York Post reports on the willingness of President Trump to meet with the family of Ruby Garcia, murdered by an illegal alien.

Former President Donald Trump said Monday he would “love” to see the family of Ruby Garcia — the 25-year-old allegedly killed by her illegal immigrant boyfriend in Michigan — at his Tuesday rally in the Mitten State.

“I’d love to have her family there if they’d like to be there,” Trump said in an interview with Detroit radio host Justin Barclay.

Garcia, of Grand Rapids, was found dead along a highway with multiple gunshot wounds to her head on March 22. Brandon Ortiz-Vite, 25, later confessed to shooting Garcia in her car, turning himself in to police with blood on his clothes, according to local reports.

Ortiz-Vite said he shot Garcia after they had an argument, and he subsequently moved her body out of the car and drove away, according to local reports citing court documents.

(Read more at the New York Post)

If this does not constitute a “bloodbath,” then please correct me.

Hardly a day goes by without an article in the alternative press recording the death of an American (usually a child or young person).

I would say that “If this were done under the purview of Trump, this would be all over the front pages;” however, that might depend on whether the Chamber of Commerce were driving the open border policy.

A contrast between Joe Biden’s Easter tweet and what the newest controversy the Left has imposed on President Trump

Featured

This is a president who insults and attacks Christians on every turn

On Easter Sunday, Joe Biden proclaims the day to be Transgender Day of Visibility in a tweet

The New York Post reports on how the White House now is painting anyone critical of Joe proclaiming Easter to be Transgender Day of Visibility as being “hateful and dishonest.”

As President Biden faces heated backlash over marking March 31 as “Transgender Day of Visibility,” which falls on Easter Sunday this year, the White House has issued a response standing by the president’s remarks.

White House spokesman Andrew Bates released a statement saying those critical of Biden’s inclusiveness message are trying to further divide the country.

“As a Christian who celebrates Easter with family, President Biden stands for bringing people together and upholding the dignity and freedoms of every American,” Bates said in a statement. “Sadly, it’s unsurprising politicians are seeking to divide and weaken our country with cruel, hateful and dishonest rhetoric. President Biden will never abuse his faith for political purposes or for profit.”

While March 31 has been designated to honor the transgender movement internationally since 2009, this year it falls on Easter Sunday, one of the most important days for Christians celebrating the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

“On Transgender Day of Visibility, we honor the extraordinary courage and contributions of transgender Americans and reaffirm our Nation’s commitment to forming a more perfect Union — where all people are created equal and treated equally throughout their lives,” a statement released by the White House Saturday said.

“Today, we send a message to all transgender Americans: You are loved. You are heard. You are understood. You belong. You are America, and my entire Administration and I have your back,” it added. “Now, therefore, I, Joseph R. Biden Jr., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 31, 2024, as Transgender Day of Visibility.”

(Read more at the New York Post)

So Biden, on one of Christianity’s most holy days, proclaims the honoring of transgenderism

Tell me what other interpretation can be pulled from the following tweet:

Hey, Joe! What have you said about the transgender who murdered three Christian children and three Christian adults in Nashville, Tennessee?

Oddly, when it comes to things that transgender people have really done, Joe Biden has not come out to comment on these events:

For the record, Joe Biden has been one to persecute Christians

Take note that Joe Biden has been in office when:

Furthermore, don’t forget that Joe could not condemn the Nashville shooter (and would not honor the three children and three adults shot at that Christian school).

Of course, we know of how Joe banned religious-themed designs from White House Easter egg art contest.

The New York Post digs into how Joe not only promoted the “Transgender Day of Visibility,” but also silenced any Christian voices at the Easter egg art contest.

Children of the National Guard are prohibited from submitting religious Easter egg designs for the 2024 “Celebrating National Guard Families” art event at the White House.

The art contest is part of the White House’s Easter traditions, which include the annual Easter Egg Roll.

The flyer for the contest states that an Easter egg design submission “must not include any questionable content, religious symbols, overtly religious themes, or partisan political statements.”

“As part of the White House Easter traditions, America’s Egg Farmers – for nearly 50 years – have proudly presented an intricately decorated Commemorative Easter Egg to the First Lady of the United States. In 2021, the White House expanded on this longstanding tradition by displaying youth-designed Easter eggs in the White House East Colonnade,” the flyer explains.

“On behalf of First Lady Jill Biden, The Adjutants General of the National Guard are asking youth from National Guard families across the United States and all U.S. territories to submit artwork inspired by the theme ‘Celebrating our Military Families,’” the flyer continues.

Children are asked to design eggs with images based on their own lives.

“Selected designs representing the unique experience and stories of National Guard children will be brought to life on real hen eggs by talented egg artists from across the country and displayed at the White House this Easter and Passover season,” the flyer says.

Children also can’t promote material that promotes “bigotry, racism, hatred or harm against any group or individual or promotes discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age” in their designs.

Selected designs will be painted by artists on real eggs and displayed at the White House.

The White House announced Thursday that the annual Easter Egg Roll would follow an “EGGucation” theme as it has in years past.

(Read more at the New York Post)

Despite the claims by Joe, transgenders do not see persecution in America

In contrast, President Trump gets roasted for promoting patriotism and a Bible

CNN (who could not be accused of supporting the Christian point of view) reports on its suggestion that “some Christians” (which could be possible in this large and sometimes deluded country) are offended by President Trump selling a King James Bible that includes the words to God Bless the USA and the text of The Declaration of Independence, the Pledge of Allegiance, and other historic American documents.

Former President Donald Trump is officially selling a patriotic copy of the Christian Bible themed to Lee Greenwood’s famous song, “God Bless the USA.”

“Happy Holy Week!” Trump announced on social media Tuesday, during the most solemn period of the Christian calendar, the last week of the Lenten season marking the suffering and death of Jesus. “As we lead into Good Friday and Easter, I encourage you to get a copy of the God Bless The USA Bible.”

The concept of a Bible covered in the American flag, as well as a former president’s endorsement of a text Christians consider to be sacred, has raised concern among religious circles. It’s also raised questions about Trump’s motivations, as the former president finds himself in the middle of several expensive legal battles.

(Read more at CNN)

Although President Trump cannot be accused of being a preacher, I do believe that the Left has gone full force at trying to nullify the effects of the Church. Furthermore, I also believe that, despite the protestations of the Left, America was largely built on the pillars of Judeo/Christian ethics and would do well to return to those pillars.

Promoting a Bible that includes the words of the Declaration of Independence would show the links between our founding and the faith of those who founded this nation. Additionally, considering the words of that Book of Books would do better than doing nobody harm.

Can you imagine what might happen would everyone in the nation read the Book of John and start living by the directions in that book?

Since it is my bet that the Christian leaders who might protest the most might also not have a problem with gay clergy, I don’t put too much weight in the sources cited by CNN

If the people at CNN were not so likely to promote gay clergy, drag queen story times at church, and similar events, I might give them a little more credence.

There is another quote that applies here (never mind the things President Trump does)

so is my word that goes out from my mouth: It will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it. (‭Isaiah 55:11 NIV‬)

There is something else in the works…

So, when you remember the acts of Joe, also remember that these politicians are the enemies who have identified as once being within Republican circles. They should not be allowed to return.

These politicians should not make it through another Republican primary.

These are the Democrats in Republican clothing who would put on a show for certain Republican values, but voted primarily with Democrats and left the Republican party at a time where it helped Democrats:

These politicians should not be allowed to join Republican politics again.

They seem more than willing to just hand over the reigns to Hakeem Jeffries (and then you will see real election denialism).