Democrats may have a problems with anti-semitism (a form of racism) since they have promoted racism as negative racism
Loyola Law School anti-racism fellow goes on one racist rant
PJ Media comments on the Loyola Law School fellow (who, as a teacher of the law and one who centers his teachings on anti-racism, should know the boundaries of the forum) who went on a racist rant.
You might think that Loyola law student Grace Obi-Azuike would know better than to address some of her fellow students as “all you ugly ass little Jewish people,” while ordering them to “get the f*** out of here” during a public meeting.
That’s just basic good sense in this age of smartphones and video surveillance pretty much everywhere, even for foul-mouthed bigots. But in Obi-Azuike’s case, it’s worse.
Obi-Azuike, who is black, is also a Loyola Law School Anti-Racism Fellow where students say, “We embrace our moral and professional duty to engage, confront and dismantle individualized and structural racism, and we strive to integrate the values of anti-racism, equity and inclusion throughout our curriculum, programs and the law school community.”
Fellows are selected “based on a combination of factors including academic achievement, leadership potential, experience in social and racial justice work, and community service,” and receive “mentorship from LARC faculty and serve as a research assistant for a LARC project or initiative and a summer stipend.”
So here’s a charming little video of Obi-Azuike doing and saying exactly what I just told you she had done and said.
(Read more at PJ Media)
I have heard of conservatives being baited into an argument and then expelled shortly before graduation.
It would seem that even this liberal institution might want to at least investigate this outburst.
…
Democrats may have a problem with anti-semitism because they have taken on the “submit or die” culture of Islam
Columbia University bans student who said “Zionists don’t deserve to live”
Breitbart reports on the suspension of a Columbia student leader of the pro-Palestinian protests over his claim that “Zionists don’t deserve to live.”
Columbia University banned a student protest leader who made remarks in a video that “Zionists don’t deserve to live,” a spokesperson from the university said, according to Fox News.
Khymani James, a junior at the university and one of the leaders of the anti-Israel encampment, issued an apology in a post on X early Friday morning in which he expressed that he had “misspoke in the heat of the moment.”
“I am frustrated that words I said in an Instagram Live video have become a distraction from the movement for Palestinian liberation,” James said. “I misspoke in the heat of the moment, for which I apologize.”
(Read more at Breitbart)
If this student can apologize out of this without consequence,
Admittedly, none of us know what the consequences of this suspension will be until some time elapses. However, if this student is allowed to just rejoin the student population (without having to lay out a semester or pay any other price), then that stands as an injustice for the Jewish students who had to hide while people like this beat on the doors. In light of our nation’s having rejected separate “Colored” and “White” drinking fountains, the separate-but-equal notion of Jewish students having to both take classes and tests from home does not seem American.
Therefore, there had better be more than just an apology in this student leader’s cost of threatening genocide.
…
Democrats may have an anti-semitism problem (and overall racism problem) because they don’t apply rules evenly
California university lecturer says “whites are psychopaths”
Just The News informs us of a California university lecturer who built a course on the racist claim that “whites are psychopaths” while being able to deliver his special 8-week, high-dollar course.
As part of Black History Month event, author Dante King delivered a lecture sharing a title with his upcoming $1,295, 8-week course, “Diagnosing Whiteness and Anti-Blackness: White Psychopathology, Collective Psychosis and Trauma in America.”
In his lecture, he also claimed that white “behavior represents an underlying, biologically transmitted proclivity with roots deep in their evolutionary history.”
A video of the lecture reposted on X went viral, rapidly accumulating 2.2 million views, with pundits calling the lecturer “racist” and “bigoted” for his remarks.
King’s speech comes as universities across the country are enacting a flurry of speech rules aimed at preventing perceived psychological harm to students, especially in the aftermath of the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict. Free speech experts, meanwhile, maintain that free speech — even uncomfortable speech — is fundamental to free inquiry and learning.
“What we saw UCSF do recently is what we want all colleges to do in controversies around protected speech: be neutral. Universities should get comfortable again playing host to even the most divisive debates and discussions. That’s the purpose of a college campus,” said Alex Morey, Director of Campus Rights Advocacy at the free-speech civil rights group Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, to The Center Square.”
“Too many colleges in recent times have strayed and find themselves constantly wading into political debates or taking sides against scholars or students,” continued Morey. “That sets these administrators up for disaster, particularly when situations like Israel/Palestine arise and campuses are sharply divided.”
According to FIRE, California is home to some of the nation’s worst censors in higher education. While FIRE did not analyze UC SF, the other schools in the University of California system ranged from “average” to “poor” in its free speech rankings, with flagship UC Berkeley and UC Los Angeles universities coming in as “slightly below average.”
(Read the whole article at Just The News)
This seems like another case of liberal “rules for thee, not for me”
Odd that the state and university system most likely to exclude conservative thought from its campus will now start alternately pointing toward either “free speech” or “speech rules.” It almost seems that the liberals cannot decide the best way to stifle dissent while pushing their viewpoints. It would be nice, however, if they would decide on a single standard and apply that to all parties involved.
…
Mark 1:1 