A set of events that started with covering up the elitism of Nancy Pelosi

First, Pelosi stumpbled into her own Watergate at the hair salon

Fox News reports on the events that began Pelosi complaining that she “was set up.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited a San Francisco hair salon on Monday afternoon for a wash and blow-out, despite local ordinances keeping salons closed amid the coronavirus pandemic, Fox News has learned.

In security footage obtained by Fox News, and timestamped Monday at 3:08 p.m. Pacific Time, the California powerhouse is seen walking through ESalonSF in San Francisco with wet hair, and without a mask over her mouth or nose.

The stylist doing her hair can be seen following her wearing a black face mask.

Salons in San Francisco had been closed since March and were only notified they could reopen on Sept. 1 for outdoor hairstyling services only.

(Read more at Fox News)

So we have one more case of masks for thee, not for me. Salons for me, not for thee.

With Californian salon owners (along with gym owners and restaurant owners) under the jackbooted heel of Democrats, more than a few people are wondering how they will meet their bills. However, among these people that worry about paying their bills, you will not find Nancy “let them eat ice cream” Pelosi.

Rather than worrying about her constituents (and maybe working with her fellow Democrats to loosen controls on businesses), Nancy Pelosi instead worries about how she looks. I guess these are among the priorities of someone who pulls a six-figure salary and has amassed a wealth of millions.

…

Hypocritically, Pelosi claims that Republicans don’t believe in science because they don’t wear masks

Breitbart looks straight into the camera and claims that Republicans are the problem because they do not believe in science (as shown by the fact that they don’t wear masks).

On Tuesday’s broadcast of Bloomberg’s “Balance of Power,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) stated that Republicans “don’t believe in science.” And that is why they have not “gone with the testing, tracing, treatment, isolation, mask-wearing, etc.”

Pelosi responded to a question on Republican objections that federal assistance for state and local governments will go towards things that are not related to the coronavirus and whether she would be “willing to attach restrictions that say it really goes for things specifically related to COVID-19?” by stating, “Well, first of all, I wouldn’t say those are reasons that they’re not doing it. I think those are excuses. Because they don’t believe in governance. They don’t believe in science. Therefore, they haven’t gone with the testing, tracing, treatment, isolation, mask-wearing, etc. They don’t believe in science, and they don’t believe in governance. So, there is no — this money that we wanted [for] state and local government is for a very specific, coronavirus-centric purpose, to offset some of the expenses that have already — the outlays that have already been made to fight the virus, and meet the needs — the health needs, of people infected. And secondly, to talk about the loss of revenue because of the shutdowns around the country.”

(Read this at Breitbart)

Pelosi, you should stop accusing others when you are a terrible example yourelf

Compare this attack on President Trump to the maskless Pelosi traipsing through the San Francisco salon and it starts to ring bells on the hypocrite-o-meter. However, for Pelosi, this does not count as anything new — since she famously proclaims herself a “faithful Christian” while supporting abortion through all 9 months.

…

To cover up Pelosi’s salon blunder and excuse, The Atlantic lies

Townhall outlines how The Atlantic claimed to look back to an event two years ago that they said was told to them by an un-named source. Now, 20 named witnesses say that the event never happened.

I mean, I guess we shouldn’t be shocked over this development. We can’t. The liberal news media has behaved badly for years. It’s become abjectly awful under the Trump White House. They can’t report on anything accurately. This began immediately when they reported that Trump removed the bust of MLK, Jr. from the Oval Office. Not true. The Russian collusion hoax is perhaps the pinnacle of absurdity from the fake news press. The level of failure here is biblical. So, when a reporter from Time magazine ventured into Wisconsin to see if The Atlantic’sshoddy hit piece on Trump in which he supposedly called our American war dead “losers” and “suckers,” we shouldn’t be shocked that no one believed it. Actually, it’s a tad worse than that; no one even brought it up in her interviews.
https://twitter.com/CharlotteAlter/status/1303063745766318081
https://twitter.com/CharlotteAlter/status/1303064865876127744
https://twitter.com/CharlotteAlter/status/1303067981497479171

Charlotte Alter conducted scores of interviews with people across Milwaukee. It didn’t change the voting behaviors of either camp. The Trump folks either didn’t believe it. The undecided didn’t even bring it up, but when prompted—didn’t believe it. And of course, nothing in the Biden camp. They were voting against Trump no matter what.

You can guess why this was a dud. It’s a circus.

‘Anonymous sources confirm what other anonymous sources said in the article…grounded in unnamed sources with firsthand knowledge.’ Yeah, all of this based on the anti-Trump press’ reservoir of liars and haters. When you have that unhinged resource, you can churn out all the fake news you want. And guess what—everyone has had it. No one cares.

(Read more at Townhall)

At times, it seems The Atlantic has made efforts to join the ranks of CNN and MSNBC

There are times that certain news outlets try to make a distinction that pulls their name into the limelight. For CNN, it has been a matter of consistently pulling for the Democrat side since Bill and Hillary Clinton were hiding their Whitewater deals. For CBS, we experienced Dan Rather being duped by fake letters regarding President George W. Bush’s service.

With these repeated uses of unnamed sources, it seems that The Atlantic is trying to make a name for it self. Other than mud, I am not sure what that name is.

…

The Atlantic has been caught in another lie

Townhall details how another reporter at that discredited rag has been caught in another lie.

As The Atlantic faces backlash for publishing a hit piece on President Trump over comments he allegedly made about America’s fallen soldiers, which no one believes and has been disputed by more than 20 Trump officials, another writer for the outlet has been caught in a lie.

Over the weekend, a staff writer claimed a Trump campaign spokesman “mockingly tweeted a video of Biden visiting his son’s grave.”

That sounds bad, if true. But as The Federalist’s Sean Davis pointed out, the pool report and video of Biden show he was not visiting his son’s grave.

“As the pool report from Sunday makes very clear, Biden never stopped to visit any graves. He walked out of church at 11:22 a.m., his motorcade left at 11:24 a.m., and Biden was home at 11:28 a.m. Why does @TheAtlantic keep fabricating stories?” he asked.

“Taken verbatim from the pool report: A reporter “shouted at [Biden] to come talk to us. [Biden] waved and continued walking to his SUV.” Exactly as described by the Trump campaign spokesman in his tweet,” Davis continued.
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1303360333306880006

(Read more at Townhall)

So, if something comes out of the The Atlantic, The New York Times, CNN, or a dog, inspect it before consuming it

One of the oldest Aggie jokes goes as follows:

An Aggie stepped out of his dorm room early in the morning and found a suspicious pile. At that point, he observed, “It looks like dog poop. It smells like dog poop. It feels like dog poop. It tastes like dog poop.”

Then he stepped back and also observed, “Sure glad I didn’t step in it.”

Don’t be like this guy when you come upon and article by one of these liberal rags.

…

As one of those who deny The Atlanic narrative, Gold Star Dad General John Kelly denies the story

Breitbart reports on the Gold Star Dad who was on the flight at the center of the article by The Atlantic.

Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow told KUSI-TV’s Paul Rudy that  recent unsubstantiated allegations published by the Atlantic suggest former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, a Gold Star father, remained silent as President Donald Trump denigrated his fallen son.

The allegations were discredited and denied by on-the-record sources who were present for the discussion in which Trump is alleged to have denigrated fallen troops.

Kelly, a retired U.S. Marine Corps general and Gold Star father whose son was killed in action in Afghanistan in 2010, took part in the above-mentioned discussion.

“What was very interesting that took place over the weekend, Zach Fuentes, who was the right-hand man of John Kelly … said that he denies the story [and] the story is not true, and he basically speaks for Kelly,” Marlow stated.

For the Atlantic‘s claims to be true, Kelly would have decided not to reveal Trump’s denigration of fallen U.S. military personnel.

Marlow continued, “What’s interesting here is that the implication with the Atlantic story is that Kelly — no fan of the president, who lost his son – who I believe stepped on a landmine and died in Afghanistan – a combat veteran and a Gold Star dad — did not speak up while the president disparaged dead troops. That’s the implication with the Atlantic story, and the fact that Kelly’s right-hand is saying it’s false, I think, makes the story purely baloney.”

Rudy asked how such comments could be kept secret and then be revealed weeks before a presidential election. “What made me roll my eyes is [that] a story of that nature — inflammatory comments of that kind — what are the odds that [they are] sitting dormant for that period of time and just conveniently popping up eight weeks in front of an election?”

Former Deputy White House Chief of Staff Zach Fuentes denied the Atlantic’s account of Trump’s alleged comments in an on-the-record interview with Breitbart News.

“You can put me on record denying that I spoke with the Atlantic,” Fuentes stated. “I don’t know who the sources are. I did not hear POTUS call anyone losers when I told him about the weather. Honestly, do you think General Kelly would have stood by and let ANYONE call fallen Marines losers?”

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton described the Atlantic‘s claims as “simply false.”

Nearly a dozen current and former Trump administration officials disputed the story.

(Read more at Breitbart)

As for myself, I believe the Gold Star Dad and the other 19 NAMED sources

Oddly, this morning as I was flipping past the local ABC affiliate, they were still talking about the accusations from The Atlantic. That, along with their fixation on demonstrably-false COVID-19 narratives, is why I refuse to watch them.

…

Democrats use the image of a wounded Afghanistan war hero without his permission in an anti-Trump propaganda piece

Fox News reports on how Democrats used the image of an Afghanistan war hero without his permission in order to produce an anti-Trump propaganda piece.

One U.S. wounded veteran is speaking out against his image being used across all social media platforms to further perpetuate a story he believes is false and made up by Democrats for political gain.

“I’m just so irritated that they put my image up there because now it looks like the president called me a loser.”  Bobby Henline, a four-tour Iraq War veteran told Fox News referring to comments allegedly made by the president regarding wounded veterans. “And they’re using that to sell something that they believe in for their agenda. It’s not fair to put us [veterans] as props in the middle of all that,”

Last week, The Atlantic published a story in which anonymous sources claimed President Trump had made disparaging remarks about fallen U.S. soldiers and veterans, calling them “suckers” and “losers” in 2018.

Henline is the lone survivor out of five soldiers in an IED blast in Iraq. He now dedicates his time to spreading laughs through comedy and positivity by speaking about veteran’s issues. As a highly recognized figure, it was brought to his attention last week that his image was being used in anti-Trump memes posted in and shared by various left-wing social media groups. He quickly took to Instagram to criticize those using him in order to spread their own “propaganda.”

(Read more at Fox News)

I understand and accept that some veterans can & do have some liberal opinions, but for Democrats to use his image without permission is beyond the pale

There should be firings at the Democrat National Convention over this. There should be resignations. This should be front-page news.

But with Democrats as the perpetrators, this will likely sail by silently.

…