Three things local news hasn’t reported about the wall


Mexican forensic workers bury unclaimed victims in a mass grave

1: The local news doesn’t report the need for the wall

Murders in Mexico rise by a third in 2018 to new record

Reuters reports in a 21 January 2019 article that murders rose in Mexico by 33%.

Murders in Mexico rose by 33 percent in 2018, breaking the record for a second year running, official data showed, underlining the task facing the new president who has pledged to reduce violence in the cartel-ravaged country.

Investigators opened to 33,341 murder probes compared with the previous year’s record of 25,036, according to information from the Interior Ministry published on Sunday.

Mexico has struggled with years of violence as the government has battled brutal drug cartels, often by taking out their leaders. That has resulted in fragmentation of gangs and increasingly vicious internecine fighting

(Read more at Reuters)

Never mind the opioid crisis made possible by the cartels sending illegal drugs across the border, Nancy. Never mind the lives destroyed by the illegals who kill our mothers, sisters, brothers, and fathers — all the while you refuse to meet with grieving angel moms, Nancy.

Nancy, since you don’t recognize facts brought to you that you don’t like — why didn’t you live by your own words. If walls are immoral and keeping people out is not what Americans do, why don’t you open your doors to Laura Loomer and the friends she brought you?

Border security is national security

2: The local press doesn’t report the desire for the wall

Most voters want secure border and say wall not immoral

OneNewsNow reports in a 15 January 2019 article how a recent poll from Rasmussen Reports contradicts the Democrat message.

In the face of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) charge that building a secure wall at the United States-Mexico border is immoral, most American voters (53 percent) disagree, while less than four in 10 embrace the pro-immigration Democrat’s advocacy of open borders.

“Fifty-three (53) percent of likely U.S. voters think it is better for the United States to tightly control who comes into the country,” Rasmussen Reports announced Monday from its latest phone and online survey conducted on 1,000 likely American voters from Jan. 10–13. “Thirty-nine (39) percent disagree and say it is better to open our borders to anyone who wants to come here – as long as they are not a terrorist or a criminal.”

(Read more at OneNewsNow)

One insane point that comes out by reading the OneNewsNow article seems to be how closely those self-identified Democrats in the poll fashion their opinions so closely to the talking points of the Democrat leadership (as opposed to the talking points of the Democrat leadership in 2008).

American Family Association Survey Finds Support for Wall Funding

The AFA publication The Stand reports in a 15 January 2019 article how their poll also supports the President’s message on the wall.

American Family Association (AFA) conducted a new survey on border security. The purpose of the survey was to identify the interest of AFA supporters on the issue of border security and to gauge the level of support they had for President Donald Trump’s plan for constructing a wall on the southern border. In the first few hours, nearly 20,000 people responded! In all, 34,514 respondents weighed in for the three-question survey that ended Friday afternoon.

First, nearly all respondents (96%) said they support President Trump’s plan for a physical barrier at the southern border. A very small number of respondents (3%) opposed the president’s plan. Respondents having no opinion on the president’s plan were few (1%).

The most startling statistic of the survey is that an overwhelming majority (90%) of AFA supporters want President Trump to continue the partial government shutdown to force Congress to fund construction for the border wall.

Building a wall on the U.S. southern border was a signature campaign promise of then-presidential candidate Donald J. Trump. His strong stance on border security was one of the main reasons he was catapulted into the presidency.

Despite a partial government shutdown, President Trump is maintaining a firm resolve to secure government funding to build the wall. Democrats in Congress seem determined in their resolve to obstruct the very agenda that put the president in the White House and are refusing to allocate funds for a border wall. Congressional Republicans are standing with the president.

(Read more at The Stand)

Take in mind that most of these respondents hold a Christian faith. According to the main stream media, that disqualifies us.

Angel moms try to meet with Nancy Pelosi

3: The local press will not show the Democrats when they refuse to listen to American victims of illegal alien crime

Angel Moms Show Nancy Pelosi’s Office Walls Kept Them Out

Breitbart reveals through a 16 January 2019 article how Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi dodged a meeting with the mothers of victims of illegal aliens.

Angel families stormed Pelosi’s office Tuesday asking for the Speaker to meet with them and hear their pleas for a wall and border security.

“It’s nice walls in here, all the way, four walls in here,” said angel mom Sabine Durden. Her son Dominic Durden was killed by an illegal alien. Durden asked the staff if she was to go through the secondary office door, would she be arrested. A Pelosi staffer simply told Durden she would ask her not to go through.

Durden then told the staff, “We asked my son’s killer not to and he still did.” – a reference to the foreign national who illegally crossed the U.S. southern border before killing her son. “And Pelosi doesn’t care about that.”

Read more at Breitbart)

But, of course, nobody ever accused San Fran Nan of being broad minded. Or open. Or fair.

I only wish that local angel moms (like Pasadena, Texas resident Mary Ann Mendoza) would get a response from local Democrats — especially those [like Lizzie Fletcher] who promised they would not be under the thumb of Nancy Pelosi).

Four (or 15) reasons the bombs probably do not come from Trump supporters


1. Trump has been leading thousands in popular rallies

1a. Massive Houston tailgate awaits Trump rallying for Cruz

For those who did not camp out overnight waiting for a place among the 19K that the Secret Service allowed into the Toyota Center, a tailgate event occurred. As documented by Fox News in a 23 October 2018 article, those outside the Toyota Center were offered a number of things in consolation.

Thousands of MAGA supporters have been tailgating for more than a day, waiting for President Trump to stage a large Monday night rally in Houston, Ted Cruz’s hometown, to help the Texas senator and his 2016 presidential rival fend off a tough challenge from Democratic Rep. Beto O’Rourke.

“I’m here to support my president,” Lisa Brewer, 55, a logistics-company worker who was the first in line, outside the Toyota Center, which seats roughly 19,000, told The New York Times. “He talks to the people.”

Brewer waited more than 32 hours, and she surely wasn’t alone.

“Everybody says, ‘Well, how could you support somebody like Trump? He tweets bad things.’ And I don’t like all of the tweets he makes,” realtor Linda Van Bebber, 64, told The Houston Chronicle. “But if you look at the bottom line, it’s a lot about him being tough on certain issues.”

With the midterm elections fast approaching, Democrats are trying to flip nearly two dozen House seats to regain control of that chamber. Republicans are trying to maintain a slim Senate majority and defend several governors’ mansions.

Houston’s police Chief Art Acevedo said that 70,000 people signed up for tickets to the rally in recent days, according to the Times.

(Read more at Fox News)

If Trumpists have flocked to events covering his accomplishments, why would one fan start bombing? Looking at the photos and videos of the many campaign events, we see little more than excited and happy people who cheer for a booming economy and lifted governmental regulations.

Trump in Missouri 2018

1b. Thousands attend Trump rally in southwest Missouri

A 21 September 2018 article from the Christian County Headliner tells us of the thousands who attended a Trump rally in Missouri.

They waited outside for hours, many of them through intermittent rain.

The most dedicated supporters stood on an arena floor for more than two hours to see President Donald Trump. The President held a “Make America Great Again” rally in Springfield at JQH Arena on the Missouri State University campus on Sept. 21. People filled the arena’s lower bowl of seats and much of the standing only space on the floor.

“This is an incredible time for our nation. We have the best economy in our history today,” Trump said. “We are restoring our industrial might like nobody can believe. Nobody believes what’s happening.”

(Read more at the Christian County Headliner)

Amateurish bomb sent to CNN

2. The bombs appear at a time when the “blue wave” seems to be fizzling

2a. Former Navy explosives expert notices strange characteristics of device sent

In a thread of tweets, Tom Sauer (a former Navy explosive ordinance disposal unit officer and graduate of the Naval Academy) offered a series of salient observations:

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

2b. A Washington Post poll points toward the disappearance of the “blue wave”

As early as April 2018, the “blue wave” seemed to be dissipating (as reported by the following 16 April 2018 Washington Post article).

Democrats hold an advantage ahead of the midterm elections, but a Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that edge has narrowed since January, a signal to party leaders and strategists that they could be premature in anticipating a huge wave of victories in November.

The poll finds that the gap between support for Democratic vs. Republican House candidates has dropped by more than half since the beginning of the year. At the same time, there has been a slight increase in President Trump’s approval rating, although it remains low. Measures of partisan enthusiasm paint a more mixed picture of the electorate in comparison with signs of Democratic intensity displayed in many recent special elections.

(Read more at the Washington Post)

2c. Even the New York Times recognizes four advantages of Republicans

The New York Times listed the following four reasons that Republicans might be excited about the midterm elections:

  • The enthusiasm bump they got from Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings seems to have stuck. The intensity gap between the two parties has narrowed, and Republicans are outpacing Democrats in early voting in most key states, according to data analyzed by NBC News.
  • The competitive incumbent Senate seats — Arizona, Nevada, Tennessee and Texas — seem tighter than a few weeks ago, according to our own polls. And Republicans feel confident about notching a win in North Dakota.
  • President Trump’s approval rating is at an all-time high, up to 47 percent, with 49 percent disapproving, according to an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
  • Democrats are banking on turnout from independents, younger voters and minority voters — groups that typically don’t show up in big numbers for midterm elections.

3. The recent calls to violence have come from Democrats

3a. Nancy Pelosi calls for ‘collateral damage’ against Republicans

A 19 October 2018 article in The Blaze points out how Nancy Pelosi reaped what she sowed in terms of violent confrontations.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi appeared stunned by loud protesters who yelled and cursed at her as she entered into a restaurant in Miami, Florida.

Pelosi had been criticized for what sounded like encouragement for Democrats to attack and harass Republicans when she said in a speech Sunday that “collateral damage” against those who disagree with them is acceptable.

“If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it,” Pelosi said.

(Read more at The Blaze)

Maxine Waters wants protesters to harass Trump officials

3b. Maxine Waters Tells Supporters to Confront Trump Officials

Time made note of Maxine Waters’ vitriolic wordsin a 23 June 2018 article.

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) is calling on her supporters to confront Trump administration officials and staffers in public amid widespread backlash to the President’s zero-tolerance policy on illegal immigration.

“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,” Waters told a crowd in California over the weekend. “If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”

(Read more at Time)

Cory Booker preaches hate

3c. Democrat Senator Cory Booker tells supporters to “Get in the faces” of Republicans

A 30 July 2018 Big League Politics article documents Cory Booker’s incitement of his supporters.

Following in the footsteps of his Leftist comrade Maxine Waters, Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) called on his supporters to confront members of Congress by “getting in their face”.

Booker made his remarks on Wednesday while speaking at the National Conference on Ending Homelessness in Washington DC. At the end of his speech, Booker told the crowd, “Go to the (Capitol) Hill today. Please, get up in the face of some Congress people … That’s my call to action here.”

(Read more at Big League Politics)

hillary-clinton-amanpour.jpg

3d. Hillary to Democrats: You can’t be civil

The Daily Wire shares in a 9 October 2018 article how Hillary wants to deny civility until Democrats rule again.

In a shocking affirmation of Democratic activists’ anti-Brett Kavanaugh strategy, Hillary Clinton told CNN’s Christine Amanpour in an interview that it is impossible to “be civil” with the Republican Party, and peace will only return to the political process when Democrats regain control of the House and Senate.

“You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” Clinton told the CNN anchor.

“That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength.” she continued.

(Read more at the Daily Wire)

ericHolderKickThem.jpg

3e. Holder says, “When they go low (and stand up for life, the concept ‘innocent until proven guilty,’ or the 2nd), we kick them”

In a 10 October 2018 Washington Times article, details about the former attorney general’s threat against his opponents were made clear.

Former Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said Wednesday that Democrats need to be as tough as Republicans to win more elections.

“Michelle [Obama] always says ‘When they go low, we go high.’ No. No. When they go low, we kick them,” he said as the crowd cheered.

Mr. Holder’s comments came as he was speaking at an event to promote Stacy Abrams, the Democrat nominee for Georgia’s gubernatorial race.

Mr. Holder stressed that this New Democratic Party is “proud as hell” and has to be willing to fight.

(Read more at the Washington Times)

3f. Professor calls for harassing Republicans at restaurants, sticking ‘fingers in their salads’

In a 17 October 2018 Washington Times article, the Times shows how incivility thrives in academia.

The University of Mississippi has condemned a tweet by a faculty member that called on activists to abandon civility and harass Republican senators in public.

“Don’t just interrupt a Senator’s meal, y’all,” James Thomas, an assistant professor of sociology, tweeted from his @Insurgent_Prof account on Oct. 6, the day Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh was sworn into the Supreme Court.

“Put your whole damn fingers in their salads,” he wrote. “Take their apps and distribute them to the other diners. Bring boxes and take their food home with you on the way out. They don’t deserve your civility.”

Without specifically naming Mr. Thomas, Ole Miss Chancellor Jeffrey Vitter issued a statement Sunday condemning a “recent social media post by a UM faculty member,” Campus Reform reported.

“A recent social media post by a UM faculty member did not reflect the values articulated by the university, such as respect for the dignity of each individual and civility and fairness,” Mr. Vitter wrote. “While I passionately support free speech, I condemn statements that encourage acts of aggression. I urge all members of the Ole Miss community to demonstrate civility and respect for others and to honor the ideal of diversity of thought that is a foundational element of the academy.”

(Read more at the Washington Times)

4. Democrats lead in acts of violence

4a. Diners confront Mitch McConnell at restaurant, get told to ‘leave him alone’ by others

Fox News

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

4b. Rep. Andy Harris is trapped in office by protesters

The Daily Caller presents a story of the grief visited on a Republican during the Kavanaugh hearings.

Pot-smoking protesters tried to force their way into Maryland Republican Rep. Andy Harris’ office on Capitol Hill on Tuesday.

According to Jennifer Bendery, a reporter for The Huffington Post, the Capitol Police confirmed that protesters pushed in the door to Harris’ office and claimed that the congressman was “assaulted.” Video of the incident does not corroborate an assault.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

(Read more at the Daily Caller)

4c. Senator Cruz chased out of DC restaurant by Democrat protesters

A 24 September 2018 Daily Caller article details the events where protesters accosted Senator Cruz and his wife while they ate at a DC restaurant.

Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz was chased out of a DC restaurant by protesters on Monday night, according to video posted on Twitter.

Two videos were posted by “Smash Racism DC” and they show a large group of protesters chanting “We believe survivors” in reference to sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh at Sen. Cruz and his wife, Heidi Cruz.

One video shows a protester confronting Sen. Cruz and his wife as they entered the restaurant. Sen. Cruz tells the woman “God bless you” before attempting to take a seat at a table.

After the protesters surround the table, Sen. Cruz tells Mrs. Cruz, “Let’s go ahead and go” and puts on his jacket to leave.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

(Read more at Daily Caller)

4d. Rep. Scalise warns of the violence that the Left instigates

The Daily Caller quotes Steve Scalise in a 7 September 2018 article as he points out the reckless attacks by the political and media Left.

The political left needs to do a better job of policing its members who are “inciting” violence, according to House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, who narrowly survived a politically-motivated mass assassination attempt in July 2017.

Noting recent instances of violence against Republicans, Scalise said that “some on the left are inciting this violence and frankly they should be called out on it.” He added that some Democrats are “almost encouraging” political violence.

The Louisiana Republican made the comments on an episode of Republican Wisconsin Rep. Sean Duffy’s podcast, Plaidcast, which aired on Friday.

“You’ve got some people on the Left, that just want this idea of resist and ignore the fact that [Trump] is president, they want to interrupt the ability of congress to do its job and of course you’ve got death threats and literal attacks on lives and frankly I want to see the Left stand up to this,” Scalise said.

(Read more at the Daily Caller)

Media Silent (Part 2)


Pelosi would like to have the Democrat party work both ways on the pro-life/pro-abortion debate,
but the pro-abortionists won’t have it.

Media Silent on Democrats Departing from the Pro-Abortion Orthodoxy

As reported in a 31 July 2017 Daily Caller article, Nancy Pelosi may be facing a fight over a commitment made by the Party.

The Democratic party is facing a revolt from the left after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman said the party would back pro-life candidates in 2018.

The DCCC chairman, Rep. Ben Ray Lujan, told The Hill that there will not be “a litmus test” for candidates on the subject of abortion. Lujan’s comments come as Democrats attempt to rebuild a broken party that has hemorrhaged elected offices on both the state and national level.

Lujan’s comments sparked immediate outrage from left-wingers.

“I’m afraid I’ll be with holding support for the DCCC if this is true,” said former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, whose name was briefly floated this year as a candidate for DNC chair.

“What better strategy than to betray their base and reaffirm that women’s basic rights are negotiable and disposable,” said prominent liberal columnist Jill Filipovic.

“Reducing the rights of those with child-bearing capacity to a mere matter of opinion is utterly unconscionable,” declared New Republic writer Rachel Cote. She added: “The Democratic Party is in fact saying that there’s ‘no litmus test’ regarding their colleagues’ support of basic bodily autonomy. Terrible.”

“This is a betrayal of every woman who has ever supported the Democratic party,” said liberal journalist Lauren Duca, whose work Hillary Clinton has personally praised.

Renee Sherman, a board member of the pro-choice group NARAL Pro-Choice America, called Lujan out by name on Twitter for not kicking pro-life candidates out of the party.

“I had an abortion. I’d love to chat with you about why my healthcare access is up for debate to win elections. Let’s talk,” said Sherman. She added: “I understand not everyone supports abortion, but you don’t have to put party money behind candidates who will take access away.”

(Read more at the Daily Caller)

With the Democrat’s “new message” about a “Better Deal,” seems like that message is just lipstick on a pig. As much as I would like to see a pro-life Democrat candidate, the money flowing from Cecile Richards and Planned Parenthood-affiliated seems to have gagged the Democrat party.

Tweets Relevant to this Democrat Civil War over Pro-Life/Pro-Abort

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Tiara Brooke Lycans

Media Silent on Lesbian Trying to Silence a Christian Judge

A 29 July 2017 New York Daily News article provides witness to anti-Christian bigotry of the Left.

A Christian judge has twice declined to recuse himself from a divorce case, after a lesbian mother filed motions citing his stance against homosexuality.

Tiara Brooke Lycans also petitioned the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, which denied her request for recusal Thursday.

She also argued that Bell, a political conservative and member of the Baptist church, “publicly expressed belief that homosexual relationships and marriages are contrary to God’s Law” — a stance she believes could influence his ruling on the custody of her child with husband, Zachary Lycans, court documents show, Al.com reported.

Judge Bell has, in his initial pending ruling on custody, granted the Lycans joint physical custody of their child alternating weekly. The appeals court noted that he had ruled the same way in two other divorce cases involving lesbian mothers.

(Read more at the New York Daily News)

If she can find proof that this judge has ruled in ways that would shift power from the powerless, then she should speak out. Otherwise, she is just posturing for the court.

A Tweet Relevant to the Case

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Media Silent on Trump Successes

Although the press has made scattered notes of Trump’s successes (each linked below), they uniformly avoid puling together a list of his successes like the one that follows.

Thanks to the American Family Association, Investor’s Business Daily commentaries on 29 April 2017 and 7 August 2017, and the White House web page for his 100-day event.

Explaining to American Media How We’ve All been Grubered


This perfect illustration of how we have been Grubered comes via a link to the IBD

Gruber Points Out the Attitude Obama has Toward Democrat Voters

Gruber Exposes the Fraud at the center of Obamacare

Here is a quote of Gruber’s explanation of how Obamacare hides its tax on your health care (with my comments set in parentheses):

 We just tax the insurance companies, they pass on higher prices, that offsets the tax break we get.  It ends up being the same thing (as a tax increase on the average American’s health care insurance).  It’s a very clever exploitation of the lack of economic understanding of the (Democrat) American voter.

Gruber admits to Frontline that Obama was present when all those involved decided to lie about the program.

Although I collected the first three videos of Gruber’s verbal flatulence without aid, I must admit that I used Nice Deb‘s post The Gruber Tapes 1-14 to collect the full set.  Similar information is also available through Paterico’s Pontifications.

The Initial Proof that Gruber was seen as Correct in Democrat Circles Comes Via the Praise of Obama and Other Democrat Luminaries

As one of the central figures in creating the Affordable Care Act (commonly referred to with multiple cursewords or the word “Obamacare”), Jonathan Gruber should be familiar to all of us since he initially collected a number of accolades from:

  1. Nancy Pelosi
  2. In 2009, Ms. “Pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it” Pelosi both knew and spoke admiringly of Jonathan Gruber.

  3. Harry Reid
  4. During 2009, Harry Reid referred to Jonathan Gruber as one of the most respected economists in the world.

  5. Obama
  6. In 2006, Obama had words of praise for Gruber.

The Proof that the Media and Politicians Realize the Unpopularity of Gruber’s Statements

Denials of Politicians

As one of the central figures in creating the Affordable Care Act (commonly referred to with multiple cursewords or the word “Obamacare”), Jonathan Gruber should be familiar to all of us since he initially collected a number of accolades from:

  1. Nancy Pelosi
  2. In November 2013, Ms. “Pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it” Pelosi denied knowing Jonathan Gruber and denied he had any part in writing the bill.

  3. Kathleen Sebelius
  4. After all sorts of stuff hit the fan, Kathleen Sebelius denied the involvement of Jonathan Gruber in the creation of the Affordable Care Act although HHS (her agency) paid him over $400,000 and other federal and state entities paid him over $1.74 million.

  5. Obama
  6. “I just heard about this. I get well briefed before I come out here. The fact that some adviser who never worked on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters is not reflection on the actual process.”

Denials of Mainstream Media

As members of the Democrat-scandal-excusing committee, most of the mainstream press began denying the reality of the situation.

  1. Juan Williams
  2. “I think Gruber was insulting to the American people and arrogant in his attitude. … I would say this is much to do with nothing.”

  3. ABC, NBC, and the LA Times
  4. Although ABC show a clip of Gruber walking on a stage, none of the audio is included. Likewise, NBC and the LA Times avoid publishing Gruber’s actual words and focus on the Republican opposition to Obamacare.

The Republican Grubers Work to Match the Democrat Example

Contempt for Voters Shown on Both Sides

Similarities between the Democrat Gruber moment and the Republican Grubers are multiple:

  • Both involved a promise of a slower deliberation process (Obama promised a 5-day period of public review while Boehner promised to give members 72 hours notice before voting)
  • Both involved one or more promises to the voting base (Obama promised lower healthcare costs and a number of other things while the Republicans ran campaigns on stopping Obama’s overreaching executive order on giving amnesty to illegal aliens)
  • Both the sets of unfulfilled promises hijacked topics that truly needed to be addressed by completely different means (healthcare prices had risen due to a lack of medical professionals in many areas, the mandated provision of free medical care, the over-billing of medical expenses to insurance companies, and many other factors)(the illegal alien issue had built due to amnesty provided by several presidents, a lax immigration policy that often does not allow the border guard to do its job, a president who repeatedly promised benefits to illegal aliens,  and many other factors)
  • Both resulted in benefiting groups that had nothing to do with the central bill (the Democrats got a tax break for Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, federal money for ACORN — the left-wing activist group connected to phony voter registration lists, $600 million Medicaid payments for Vermont, $10+ billion for government health centers in Vermont, $4.3 billion in extra Medicaid funds for Louisiana, Medicare benefits for Florida, Medicare for hospitals in North Dakota, extended Medicare payments for Montana miners, and much more) (the Republicans funded $1.2 billion for the National Guard and Reserve Equipment account, $1.1 billion for congressionally-directed medical research, $255 million for two F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft, $175.5 million for the National Guard counter-drug program, $120 million for the M1 Abrams Upgrade Program, $25 million for STARBASE, $20 million for alternative energy research, and other programs)
  • Both the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and the Continuing Resolution Omnibus Spending Bill (Cromnibus) were heavily lobbied for by Obama and the Democrats.  However, due to the pending Republican majorities in both the House and Senate, Republicans got most of the earmarks in this bill.  (Nonetheless, Democrats did get bailouts for Wall Street and banking friends of Democrats, and other perks.  Depending on whether the Old Guard Republicans around Boehner are telling the truth or the New Buck Republicans like Allen West are telling the truth, Obama may have been denied funding for Obamacare or received 10 months of funding for Obamacare.  Similarly, the Obama amnesty may have been defunded or it may have received 2 months funding through HHS [the department funding the illegal alien amnesty].  Stay tuned for confirmations.)

Actual Reasons for Why this Slipped by

Why Democrats and the Media Excuse Obama’s Illegal Actions — Obama’s Black Skin Privilege

Ben Shapiro: Republicans Secretly Want Obama’s Amnesty