Democrats disagree on whether party has antisemitism problem
Fox News shines a small light on the anti-semitism problem boiling in the Democrat party since they decided to replace blacks with other imported minorities.
Democrats are not seeing eye to eye on whether the party has a problem with antisemitism ahead of the November general election.
“It’s easy to call out people with Tiki torches saying ‘Jews will not replace us’ or the former president saying ‘very fine people on both sides,'” Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla., said in a statement to Fox News Digital, referencing a rally with White supremacists in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017.
“However, when Democrats look inward and see ‘go back to Poland’ or ‘kill the Zionists,’ they pretend the antisemitic rhetoric on the left isn’t happening, or they are silent,” he added. “And as it turns out, the left and the right have something in common.”
As the war between Israel and terrorist group Hamas has gone on, initially spurred by the latter’s surprise attack on innocent civilians on Oct. 7, acts of antisemitism have been observed more often in the U.S.
The Anti-Defamation League reported that U.S. antisemitic assaults in the three months following the October attack in Israel shot up, surpassing the totals for entire years in the past.
The ADL said 3,291 assaults happened between Oct. 7 and Jan. 7. In 2022, 3,697 assaults occurred over the course of the entire year. The totals for each of the last 10 years, except for 2022, were less than that three-month period following the beginning of Israel’s war with Hamas.
This month, anti-Israel and antisemitic demonstrations rapidly expanded at top-tier universities, with a Gaza solidarity encampment that is persisting at Columbia University inspiring many of its higher education counterparts to take over their respective campuses, disrupt school activity, and intimidate Jewish students.
(Read more at Fox News)
This seems a lot like the six decades of denial following the Dixiecrat issue
This has more to do with Democrats not having a prayer of retaining their seats in the House, Senate, or (possibly) the Oval Office than anything else. Much like the surge that Biden’s early years saw toward appeasing the Dixiecrat voters who did not want their children in schools with minorities, this is a play toward a set of voters.
However, the problem with this play for votes is that it carries with it an implicit endorsement. During the early 1960’s, the Democrat party playing to the demands of the Dixiecrats implicitly endorsed suppression of minorities.
Now, this implicit endorsement seems to be one of favoring Islam (or at least diminishing the Jewish presence among us).
…
Squad Representative Jamaal Bowman accuses the pro-Israel group backing opponent of both being racist and while he claims to read minds: “They want to call me the N-word.”
The New York Post quotes Jamaal Bowman in his assertion that he knows what his opponents think when he says: “They want to call me the N-word.”
“Squad” Rep. Jamaal Bowman claimed a pro-Israeli group backing his Democratic primary opponent is racist.
“That is why AIPAC’s [ American Israel Public Affairs Committee] is coming after us, coming after us with hate, coming after us with bullying, intimidation, and fear. You should see what they’re doing in my district,” Bowman said during a virtual town hall meeting on Monday.
After he claimed AIPAC members are lying about his record and calling him antisemitic, Bowman said, “They don’t like my style, I’m a little too radical, I’m a member of the ‘Squad.’ They want to call me the N-word, but they know they can’t get away with that, so they say everything else.”
(Read more at the New York Post)
Isn’t this, like most cases of claimed racism by Democrats, an instance of projected racism?
Is it that all the other accusations are actually true and this is the only way that Mr. Bowman could interject racism into the mix?
The problem is that (since the press only reports on things favorable to Democrats) we will likely never hear through the main stream press of any allegation made against Mr. Bowman. Therefore, it will be impossible to know if any or all of those allegations were in themselves substantive.
…
Let’s look at the current leader of the Democrats: Joe Biden
Biden’s history of getting away with racist remarks
The Heritage Foundation uses a 7 July 2021 article to give us a short overview of the racist remarks made by Joe Biden.
Joe Biden has a decades-long habit of making overtly racist remarks, taking discriminatory positions and cavorting with known racists—things that would get anyone to his political right tossed out of polite society. But being on the left must make it okay.
Just a few days ago, while lamenting the difficulty in convincing many Latinos and blacks to take the COVID vaccine, he committed a series of racially charged blunders that barely registered in the corporate media’s consciousness.
Biden white-splained that Latinos in America resist vaccinations because “they’re worried that they’ll be vaccinated and deported.”
This statement makes the insane assumption that all Latinos present in this country are illegal aliens subject to expulsion. It never occurred to Biden that more than 60 million Latinos are actually American citizens, according to recent census figures.
(continued)
In the same breath as his “Latinx” comment, Biden lectured about the fears that blacks may have of the vaccine, attempting to point to historically shameful episodes when they were subjected to inhumane medical experiments.
“They are used to being experimented on—the Tuskegee Airmen and others,” Biden said.
In this, he confused legendary World War II fighter pilots with a long, notorious governmental study of syphilis among black men—the Tuskegee Experiment.
(continued)
Examples dating back to his campaign for president (and earlier) abound.
On Charlamagne Tha God’s popular morning radio show in May 2020, Biden infamously asserted to the largely black audience that if they were unsure of whether to vote for him or Trump, then “you ain’t black!”
Then in August 2020, Biden told a gathering of black and Hispanic journalists that “unlike the African American community, with notable exceptions, the Latino community is an incredibly diverse community with incredibly different attitudes about different things.”
Taken together, these statements clearly suggest that Biden believes all black people think alike.
(continued)
Put these words into Mitch McConnell’s mouth and try to envision how long he’d be allowed to remain in the Senate, let alone in a leadership position.
But Biden has been getting away with this for years.
In 2010, he warmly eulogized Sen. Robert Byrd, a former Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan, saying he was “one of my mentors” and that “the Senate is a lesser place for his going.”
In 2007, he referred to Barack Obama as “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean.”
In 2006, he said, “You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.”
Way back in 1977, he said that forced busing to desegregate schools would cause his children to “grow up in a racial jungle.”
Of course, he infamously worked with segregationist senators to oppose that mandatory busing, which decades later led to the strongest moment in Kamala Harris’s campaign for president, when she blasted him as having personally impacted her as a young girl.
And over the course of his entire career, he had kind words to say about staunchly segregationist senators.
(Read more at the Heritage Foundation)
Overall, this points out the benefit of being a leftist.
These statements, along with numerous others, point to how the press will ignore the shortcomings of a leftist who says these things while they will make up quotes and apply them to conservatives.
…
Joe Biden didn’t just compromise with segregationists. He fought for their cause in schools.
Even NBC News couldn’t deny the history Joe Biden had built with segregationists in his early years as a senator.
Biden’s role in fighting student busing more than four decades ago has received renewed attention after the 76-year-old presidential candidate touted his ability to compromise with segregationists during his long Senate career. Biden said he disagreed strongly with these Southerners’ views but needed to work with them to get things done. Biden’s comments set off a firestorm among his political rivals and some political analysts, who described his language as offensive and anachronistic.
But political experts and education policy researchers say Biden, a supporter of civil rights in other arenas, did not simply compromise with segregationists — he also led the charge on an issue that kept black students away from the classrooms of white students. His legislative work against school integration advanced a more palatable version of the “separate but equal” doctrine and undermined the nation’s short-lived effort at educational equality, legislative and education history experts say.
“Biden, who I think has been good overall on civil rights, was a leader on anti-busing,” Rucker Johnson, author of the book “Children of the Dream: Why School Integration Works,” said. “A leader on giving America the language to oppose it despite it being the most effective means of school integration at that time.”
(Read more at NBC News)
Maybe this is the reason that Biden is dumping the Black vote for the Muslim vote.
Maybe even Joe figures that the maximum number of double-crosses has been reached for the Black community.
…
Mark 1:1 