Democrat lie #1: 6 January was just right-wing people attacking
An F.B.I. informant marched into the Capitol among the Proud Boys on 6 January
The New York Times admitted that an the FBI had planted an informant among the Proud Boys during the 6 January 2021 march. Makes you wonder how many other plants there were.
As scores of Proud Boys made their way, chanting and shouting, toward the Capitol on Jan. 6, one member of the far-right group was busy texting a real-time account of the march.
The recipient was his F.B.I. handler.
In the middle of an unfolding melee that shook a pillar of American democracy — the peaceful transfer of power — the bureau had an informant in the crowd, providing an inside glimpse of the action, according to confidential records obtained by The New York Times. In the informant’s version of events, the Proud Boys, famous for their street fights, were largely following a pro-Trump mob consumed by a herd mentality rather than carrying out any type of preplanned attack.
This comes with a hat tip to The Right Scoop
We need to look at the FBI history of arranging crime to “catch” criminals
As illustrated by Buzzfeed News in their review of the case where the FBI got involved in the kidnapping of Governor Gretchen Whitmer, not all criminals commit their crimes without some leading.
The audacious plot to kidnap a sitting governor — seen by many as a precursor to the Jan. 6 assault on the US Capitol by hundreds of Trump-supporting protesters — has become one of the most important domestic terrorism investigations in a generation.
The prosecution has already emerged as a critical test for how the Biden administration approaches the growing threat of homegrown anti-government groups. More than that, though, the case epitomizes the ideological divisions that have riven the country over the past several years. To some, the FBI’s infiltration of the innermost circle of armed anti-government groups is a model for how to successfully forestall dangerous acts of domestic terrorism. But for others, it’s an example of precisely the kind of outrageous government overreach that radicalizes people in the first place, and, increasingly, a flashpoint for deep state conspiracy theories.
The government has documented at least 12 confidential informants who assisted the sprawling investigation. The trove of evidence they helped gather provides an unprecedented view into American extremism, laying out in often stunning detail the ways that anti-government groups network with each other and, in some cases, discuss violent actions.
An examination of the case by BuzzFeed News also reveals that some of those informants, acting under the direction of the FBI, played a far larger role than has previously been reported. Working in secret, they did more than just passively observe and report on the actions of the suspects. Instead, they had a hand in nearly every aspect of the alleged plot, starting with its inception. The extent of their involvement raises questions as to whether there would have even been a conspiracy without them.
A longtime government informant from Wisconsin, for example, helped organize a series of meetings around the country where many of the alleged plotters first met one another and the earliest notions of a plan took root, some of those people say. The Wisconsin informant even paid for some hotel rooms and food as an incentive to get people to come.
(Read more at Buzzfeed New)
Therefore, it seems reasonable to ask whether the accused criminals really did anything worthy of punishment or were lead to a prepared crime.
…
Democrat lie #2: Fox is conservative
Fox News bans Rudy Giuliani from appearing
The Hill reports that Fox has banned Rudy Giuliani from speaking on their outlets.
Fox News has banned Rudy Giuliani and his son from appearing on its network, Politico Playbook reported on Friday.
Giuliani, who served as a personal attorney to former President Trump, has reportedly been banned for close to three months and only learned of the move by the news network right before Sept. 11, the news outlet reported.
Prior to a scheduled appearance on “Fox & Friends” on Sept. 11, “Fox & Friends Weekend” co-host Pete Hegseth apparently called the former New York City mayor the night before and apologized, telling him he had been canceled from their guest list.
A source close to the former New York City mayor told Playbook that Giuliani was upset by the decision because he had “done a big favor” for Fox Corp. founder and Chairman Rupert Murdoch.
“He was instrumental in getting Fox on Time Warner so it could be watched in New York City,” the source told Playbook.
A spokesperson for Fox denied Politico’s report that Giulani had been scheduled to appear on “Fox & Friends” on Sept. 11, but that person declined to comment on whether there was a ban for the former New York City mayor.
Additionally, Giuliani’s son, Andrew Giuliani, has also been reportedly banned, though it is unclear when that ban would have started. Since his New York gubernatorial campaign was initiated in May, Andrew Giuliani has not appeared on the network, Politico Playbook reported.
The news outlet reported that the Giulianis were told that the ban had come from the top of the network.
(Read more at The Hill)
Can’t accuse him? Silence him.
Yes, Rudy has had a few slips recently. As we get older, we all do that. However, for the most part, he seems of very sound mind.
The main thing with Rudy was he made crucial decisions that secured New York for a period of time and he held a key position during a pivotal period of American history (the 9/11 attacks). While lefties like those in charge of Fox News cannot take that from him, they can silence him.
Of course, since Fox began as a conservative powerhouse, it still holds a number of conservative voices. However, since the leadership has gone to the left, we cannot expect it to remain as a conservative source (as shown when it called Arizona for Biden early).
…
Democrat lie #3: There was Trump/Russia collusion in 2016
Jake Sullivan repeatedly promoted Alfa Bank story at the center of Durham indictment
The Washington Examiner points out how Joe Biden’s advisor Jake Sullivan repeatedly promoted the fake Alfa Bank story central to the story pushed by indicted Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann.
Special Counsel John Durham’s indictment of Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann will likely have made uncomfortable reading for a key member of President Joe Biden’s administration — his beleaguered national security adviser Jake Sullivan.
The grand jury indictment against Sussmann centers on a September 2016 meeting between him and then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in which Sussmann passed along allegations claiming there was a secret backchannel between Russia’s Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization. While Durham says Sussmann told Baker he was not working for any specific client, the special counsel contends he was secretly doing the bidding of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign as well as working on behalf of a yet-unnamed technology company executive. Sussmann pleaded not guilty .
The Durham indictment states that “on or about September 15, 2016, Campaign Lawyer-1 exchanged emails with the Clinton Campaign’s campaign manager, communications director, and foreign policy advisor concerning the Russian Bank-1 allegations that SUSSMANN had recently shared with Reporter-1.” Durham wrote that “Campaign Lawyer-1 billed his time for this correspondence” to the Clinton campaign, with the billing entry of “email correspondence with [name of foreign policy advisor], [name of campaign manager], [name of communications director] re: [Russian Bank-1] Article.”
Clinton’s foreign policy adviser was Sullivan, while her campaign manager was Robby Mook, and communications director was Jennifer Palmieri. “Campaign Lawyer-1” was Marc Elias. Sullivan has not been accused of wrongdoing by Durham. The White House National Security Council did not return a request for comment.
On Halloween 2016, Clinton tweeted : “Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.” And she shared a lengthy Sullivan statement.
“This could be the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow,” Sullivan claimed . “Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank. This secret hotline may be the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump’s ties to Russia. … This line of communication may help explain Trump’s bizarre adoration of Vladimir Putin.”
Sullivan added: “We can only assume that federal authorities will now explore this direct connection between Trump and Russia.”
(Read more at the Washington Examiner)
Democrats may believe the trope that “a lie repeated becomes the truth;” however, never
While there may be popular perception and a delusion that truth can be bent through the repetition of lies, the truth is that truth remains and it comes out.
That is why the New York Times and Politico find a need to cover stories like the Hunter Biden laptop when their revelation cannot hurt a Democrat. They still want to be seen as standing on the side of truth (even though they effectively lied when it made a difference).
…
Democrat lie #4: Democrats respect our system of a non-political armed services
Democrat testimony proves the politicization of the armed forces
Townhall comments on General Milley’s words regarding how Nancy Pelosi tried to take the place of the President.
During his opening statement in front of the Senate Armed Services Committee Tuesday morning, General Mark Milley denied inappropriate phone calls with the Chinese military and tried to reassure Americans he is dedicated to civilian control of the military.
“I am specifically directed to communicate with the Chinese. These military to military communications at the highest level are critical to the security of the United States,” Milley said. “My loyalty to this Nation, its people, and the Constitution hasn’t changed, and will never change, as long as I have a breath to give. My loyalty is absolute, and I will not turn my back on the fallen.”
“I firmly believe in civilian control of the military,” he continued.
Milley also stressed that he does not believe President Donald Trump planned to attack the Chinese in the final days of his presidency.
In his remarks, Milley also addressed a phone call from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on January 8, 2021, in which she pressed him about the process to launch a nuclear weapon. Milley says he informed her that while launching such a weapon requires multiple people in the chain of command, the president is the sole authority to launch an attack.
(Read the specific quote at Townhall)
Much like the Hunter Biden laptop news, admissions about the politicization of the military since Obama will likely leak out for years
Especially now that Biden is requiring everyone to take the jab or be dishonorably discharged (even if they have had COVID), we will likely see a continued politicization of our military.
…
Mark 1:1 
Yep…and I can’t help think its WE THE PEOPLE’S fault Mark. We have gone along with this for far too long. It started (well probably sooner) when we the Patriot Act came into view.
LikeLiked by 1 person
On one hand, we have let it go on too long. However, do you ever get the idea that the Progressives are trying to goad us into violence? At times, it seems to be dripping from their teeth.
LikeLiked by 1 person