Good news on New Mexico’s abortion front
OneNewsNow reports in a 14 December 2017 article how the New Mexico government will have to uphold the rights of Americans as a probe into abortionaries proceeds.
Amid a federal criminal investigation into a segment of the abortion industry, a New Mexico pro-life group contends upholding the law is far more important than political correctness.
New Mexico Alliance for Life, headed by Elisa Martinez, has been able to confirm through the offices of Congressman Steve Pierce (R-New Mexico) and Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee) that two New Mexico entities are targets of a federal probe.
“The University of New Mexico and Southwestern Women’s Options are under criminal investigation by the FBI,” states Martinez, “for the practices of illicit harvesting of infant body parts and unlawful consent forms that were given to women in order to obtain those body parts.”
In 2016, the U.S. House Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives forwarded information on possible criminal charges to New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas. And though there have been no indictments in the past year, Martinez contends there is a vital issue at stake.
“It’s extremely important that the rule of law is upheld.” declares Martinez. “No one is above the law, but a lot of folks from the other aisle are quick to defend anything that has to do with the abortion industry.”
(Read more at OneNewsNow)
Of course, this case is only in its beginning stages. Still, it provides good news to those of us who support the right to life.
.@FBIAlbuquerque Investigating @UNMHSC & Southwestern Women’s Options:
These are serious violations of the law where baby body parts were treated like commodities, women were deceived for years & nobody has held the abortion industry accountable.https://t.co/swTIBaz7Gy #nmpol pic.twitter.com/PvLjiB31Su
— NMAllianceforLife (@NMAlliance4Life) December 13, 2017
Dear @UNMHSC, you can’t just order human brains to dissect for the fun of it. Laws protect human subjects from abuses like this. #NOTresearch https://t.co/nOzlWOCb1W @UNM @FBIAlbuquerque #nmpol #AskUNM
— NMAllianceforLife (@NMAlliance4Life) December 14, 2017
Judge rejects restraining order against Tastries Bakery in lawsuit over owner’s refusal to bake same-sex wedding cakes
The Bakersfield Californian reports in a 14 December 2017 article how Kern County Superior Court Judge ruled in favor of a Christian cake maker.
Kern County Superior Court Judge David Lampe denied the state of California a temporary restraining order against a local bakery that refuses to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples.
Lampe ruled Thursday that he didn’t have enough information to make the call.
But the case is scheduled to come back to Lampe on Feb. 2 at a hearing in which Tastries Bakery could be ordered to either make wedding cakes for members of the Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transgender and Questioning community — or stop making wedding cakes altogether.
According to court records, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing petitioned the court to issue a restraining order against Tastries and owner Cathy Miller, prohibiting her from denying service to same-sex couples, as is her practice.I appreciate that Cathy Miller stood up for her beliefs. She’s the Christian owner of Tastries Bakery & refused to go against her convictions. There’s another hearing in February—pray for Cathy & for our religious freedoms to be upheld. https://t.co/eKvBpbczV5
— Franklin Graham (@Franklin_Graham) December 21, 2017
Daniel Piedra, executive director of the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which is defending Miller, said the government sought the temporary restraining order to force Miller into a tough position.
It would have required her to either make wedding cakes for LGTBQ couples or to not make wedding cakes for anyone, he said.
Piedra said Miller has been required to respond to the state with detailed personal and employment information that answers 40 questions.
Judge Lampe, he said, wants to see those answers before he rules on the restraining order.
The judge, Piedra said, felt both sides had important rights that must be seriously considered prior to taking any action.
According to a press release from the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, “the government wanted a court order to compel Miller to create wedding cakes for LGBT persons even though doing so would violate her sincerely held religious beliefs.”
Charles LiMandri, president and chief counsel for the organization, said in the press release the case was an assault on Christians and accused the state of using surprise tactics to get the court to approve the restraining order.
The case first came about in August when Miller personally refused to make a wedding cake for Eileen and Mireya Rodriguez-Del Rio, the couple said, and their concerns, expressed on social media, triggered a firestorm of debate locally.
One other same-sex couple also said they were denied a wedding cake by Miller.
Miller, at the time, said she loves all people.
But, she said, “My conscience doesn’t allow me to participate in certain activities that are contrary to my biblical beliefs. I pray that we can all come to an understanding so that we can continue to get along.”
(Read more at the Bakersfield Californian)
While this will find challenges in other courts, this is good. As a conservative, I wouldn’t want a gay man to be forced to print t-shirts for the Westboro Baptist Church. On the same note, Christians that object to participating in gay events should not be forced to be part of those events. Don’t be fooled, photographers and bakers have to participate in the event if they provide their product to the event.
Tastries Bakery under fire after reportedly refusing to serve gay couples https://t.co/wskW72wWbD
— Barracuda (@ASerignese) December 20, 2017
Kern County Superior Court Judge David Lampe denied California a temporary restraining order against Tastries Bakery for refusing to bake cakes for certain occasions that violated owner’s sincerely-held religious beliefs, per The Bakersfield Californian. https://t.co/E6OOFmWmLm
— Constitutionalist (@fredricgstewart) December 18, 2017