Wikileaks all over Hillary (Part 3: Collusion with DOJ and State Department)


Hillary Colludes with the Department of Justice and State Department

Evidence of Hillary Collusion with Department of Justice

In a 12 October 2016 Daily Caller article, the acts of press secretary Brian Fallon are laid bare:

“There is evidence that Brian Fallon, press secretary for Hillary Clinton, colluded with the Department of Justice (DOJ) during the Clinton email investigation.

Brian Fallon wrote an email to Clinton 2016 staff where he warns that the: ]DOJ just filed a briefing saying the gov’t proposes releasing HRC’s cache of work-related emails in January 2016.’

Cheryl Mills immediately freaks out, responding: ‘get out!???’

While the staff schedules an emergency damage control meeting, Fallon sends an email that shows he, a chief member of Hillary’s campaign, is colluding with the DOJ during the email investigation.

Clinton aides touted her relationship with the Department of Justice

Considering the way Podesta and Abedin casually discuss the barely-existent relationship between Lynch and Clinton, why is the email titled “Trafficking” instead of “Friendship?” Was Hillary trafficking in state secrets?

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Hillary Campaign Discusses Emails with State Department

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

The State Department tips the Hillary Campaign about the release of Benghazi emails

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

On the day the State Department IG (when Hillary had quit her position) made a statement, Podesta signals to Hillary

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Hillary’s E-mail Issues Multiply (Part 5: Benghazi Explained)


See if Hillary can blow off the testimony of Marc Turi

Obama’s Lawless Department of Justice Drops Charges Against a Gun Runner

Was This Done to Silence a Key Story Connecting Benghazi and Emailgate?

Did the Department of Justice dismiss charges against a convicted gun runner just to keep from exposing Hillary’s pipeline of weapons to Islamist groups?  Was the story embodied in Marc Tori a central part in both Benghazi and Hillary Clinton’s sordid e-mail affair? In a 4 October 2016 Politico article, indications have surfaced that point out how this case may connect the current two Clinton scandals (the bolding below has been provided for emphasis).

“The Obama administration is moving to dismiss charges against an arms dealer it had accused of selling weapons that were destined for Libyan rebels.

Lawyers for the Justice Department on Monday filed a motion in federal court in Phoenix to drop the case against the arms dealer, an American named Marc Turi, whose lawyers also signed the motion.

The deal averts a trial that threatened to cast additional scrutiny on Hillary Clinton’s private emails as Secretary of State, and to expose reported Central Intelligence Agency attempts to arm rebels fighting Libyan leader Moammar Qadhafi.

Government lawyers were facing a Wednesday deadline to produce documents to Turi’s legal team, and the trial was officially set to begin on Election Day, although it likely would have been delayed by protracted disputes about classified information in the case.

A Turi associate asserted that the government dropped the case because the proceedings could have embarrassed Clinton and President Barack Obama by calling attention to the reported role of their administration in supplying weapons that fell into the hands of Islamic extremist militants.

Turi adviser Robert Stryk of the government relations and consulting firm SPG accused the government of trying to scapegoat Turi to cover up Clinton’s mishandling of Libya.

‘The U.S. government spent millions of dollars, went all over the world to bankrupt him, and destroyed his life — all to protect Hillary Clinton’s crimes,’ he said, alluding to the deadly Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Republicans hold Clinton responsible for mishandling the circumstances around that attack. And Stryk said that Turi was now weighing book and movie deals to tell his story, and to weigh in on the Benghazi attack.

Representatives of the Justice Department, the White House and Clinton’s presidential campaign either declined to comment or did not respond to requests for comment on the case or the settlement.

Turi was indicted in 2014 on four felony counts: two of arms dealing in violation of the Arms Export Control Act and two of lying to the State Department in official applications. The charges accused Turi of claiming that the weapons involved were destined for Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, when the arms were actually intended to reach Libya.

Turi’s lawyers argued that the shipments were part of a U.S. government-authorized effort to arm Libyan rebels.

It’s unclear if any of the weapons made it to Libya, and there’s no evidence linking weapons provided by the U.S. government to the Benghazi attacks.

If the words of Marc Turi are powerful enough to have the DOJ pardon him, it would seem Congress would find a strong reason to subpoena him and find out what secrets he holds.

Considering the ways Obama has demonized guns through his speeches, the fact that his DOJ has dismissed the case of a gun runner and Obama himself pardoned 107 convicts of gun crimes points to how insincerely Obama holds his opposition of gun rights.

Relevant Biblical Points

Since this presents a glowing opportunity for the Congress to find out about the central issues of Benghazi and Emailgate, I certainly hope that the things Hillary and Obama said in secret will now come out.

For nothing is hidden, except to be revealed; nor has anything been secret, but that it would come to light. (Mark 4:22 NASB)

What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight, and what you have whispered in the ear in the inner rooms will be proclaimed from the roofs.. (Luke 12:3 NASB)

Is There Anything Hillary Does Not Lie About


At least the camera does not lie.

They Say “You Can’t Make This Up”

I Say “Why Make It Up? Hillary Does that For You”

In an Effort to Humanize Herself to the Humans of New York, Hillary Lies Again

In an effort to humanize herself to Humans of New York, Hillary related the following story in a 8 September 2016 post to their Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fhumansofnewyork%2Fposts%2F1362236273850469%3A0&width=500

As noted in a 15 September 2016 article by Red Alert Politics, there are two problems with this narrative:

  1. The Draft Deferment during the Johnson Administration had Ended

    “The problem with the former first lady’s story is that the draft exemption for law school students ended long before she ever would have taken the Harvard entry test.

    First of all, it’s odd that Clinton has never told this story before, considering she penned two autobiographies Living History and Hard Choices. Secondly, as is the case with multiple lies told by Hillary, the dates are entirely off.

    President Lyndon Johnson ended the draft deferment on Feb. 16, 1968, when Clinton was a junior at Wellesley College. She didn’t graduate until June of 1969 and probably didn’t take her LSAT until 1969, more than a year after she could have been accused of taking someone else’s spot.”
     

  2. Her Previous Account

    Another strike against Clinton’s claim was that she told the story to The New Yorker in 1996, and in that version she said that men were jerks to her, telling her to “go home and get married,” but no one told her they were going to die in Vietnam if she got accepted and they didn’t.

    The Humans of New York post was Clinton’s attempt to tell young women that she has been ostracized for being female and understands what it’s like, but the best she could come up with was a fabrication.

    Just like Clinton’s claims that she came under sniper fire in Bosnia, or that she never sent or received classified information on her private server, this was another time the Democratic nominee was caught lying to the public.”
     

Hillary’s Track Record for Running Lies Up the Flagpole

Considering Hillary’s bald-face lies on numerous issues, why should we be surprised that she would lie about her health?  During the recent past, she has lied about all of the following:

Hillary Partially Suspends Lying About Her Health

Just as the lies regarding her history (financial, work, and e-mail) did not match with reality, her health history started to show discrepancies.  Parallels between the coughing spasms that began in January 2016 and earlier protracted coughing fits during February 2011 have surfaced due to the efforts of Dan Merica.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

A 4News Video Plays Clips of Hillary Taking Both Sides of Important Issues

Although changing one’s mind is not a lie, it is a lie to profess complete commitment to a cause and then to turn away from that cause without explanation.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

For Democrat Hillary Clinton, It is Not About Lives, but Appearances


History Lesson for Millennials: Soldiers forced by Hillary to Change Uniforms Four Times

Back in 2012 when my millennial son was in middle school, Hillary was so worried about appearances that she had the Marines who stood ready to defend the Americans in Benghazi, Libya that she had those soldiers change uniforms four times.  As pointed out in a 26 June 2016 Independent Sentinel article, this protracted scene played out as follows:

“The final Benghazi report has been released and as Judge Napolitano said this morning on Fox New’s Fox & Friends, Hillary Clinton’s capacity for lying is extraordinary. ‘It is no disputed and it’s not disputable that Hillary Clinton knew the truth and lied about it and perpetuated the lie for weeks after Benghazi.’

She knew it was al Qaeda and ‘even perpetrated the myth that this was caused by a video, as the bodies were being received at Andrews Air Force Base.

The weapons came from the US to rid Libya of Colonel Gaddafi. Hillary concocted the idea and authorized the shipment of weapons to militia/terrorist groups, some of whom killed Chris Stephans.

State Department spokesperson Mark Fallon slammed the report as partisan on twitter but just the fact that this was the first committee to talk to the 80 witnesses is remarkable and showed the need for this investigation.

While the men tried to save lives and protect weaponry or secrets or whatever on a roof in Benghazi, top administration officials huddled to craft their public response.

One anti-terrorism security team sat waiting for three hours in Rota, Spain, as Marines changed ‘in and out of their uniforms four times,’ and even debated whether they should carry personal weapons, according to one witness, and as reported by Fox News.

Secretary of Defense Leon Panneta’s orders were not followed and no muscular force was sent.

NBC News wrote that the report highlights the military’s failure to carry out Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s order to deploy forces to Benghazi and the lengthy delay that prevented the military assets from arriving at the embassy in Tripoli until 2 p.m. the day after the Benghazi attack.

‘What was disturbing from the evidence the Committee found was that at the time of the final lethal attack at the Annex, no asset ordered deployed by the Secretary had even left the ground,’ the report states.

In addition, ‘Security deficiencies plagued the Benghazi Mission compound in the lead-up to September 2012.’

I haven’t had a chance to go through the rather lengthy report yet but it must also be mentioned that knowing what she knew, Hillary lied to the families of the dead about the video, saw that the videographer was imprisoned on a trivial charge, and then later called out four family members of the dead as liars when they said she told them it was about the video and she would get the videographer.

If this is what you want for president, a woman who presented no leadership and lied about it, then go for it.”

Well, nothing says “not fit for duty” like combination of wasting the time of those dedicated to defending Americans and allowing underlings to die.  Nonetheless, this lack of fitness should come as no surprise, seeing that Hillary recently objectified a large segment of America as “deplorables.”

For any doubting democrat that dares disdain the message of this post, you can read parallel reporting at the MarineTimes, Politico, The Hill, and other publications.

One of the Best Endorsements So Far


Oz Geist Speaks Against the Woman Who Wouldn’t Send Help

The following message from Mark Geist shares the irrevocable damage Hillary Clinton has done to his world (along with a warning for any of us who might want to sit out of the 2016 election).

Produced and broadcast by the National Rifle Association, the video for this ad was additionally posted at the NRA Youtube channel (gathering 998,028 views by noon on Independence day).

Obama Administration Gun Running Caused Benghazi


Thanks to StandUpAmericaUS.com for this graphic

In Addition to Fast and Furious Gun Running, Obama Administration Again Implicated in a Weapons Trafficking Scandal

As announced by Fox News and posted on the Facebook page of Col. Rob Maness (ret.):

FOX News has confirmed that the Obama Administration ran guns from Benghazi to Syria before the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans.

The report reveals that U.S. Intelligence agencies were fully aware that weapons were moving from the terrorist stronghold in Libya to Syria before the attack that killed four Americans. It also ties the attack to the 9-11 terrorist attacks, and puts to rest the Obama/Clinton narrative that the attack was a “spontaneous demonstration caused by a YouTube video.”

Hat tip to Chris Salcedo.

Takes on Hillary Clinton’s Testimony #1 – Chiller & Muddler


Thanks to FreeRepublic for this photo.

Fox News – Hillary, the Chiller

According to a Fox News assessment by K.T. McFarland, Hillary showed her chilling side in the Benghazi hearings.

“She didn’t mean to, but she showed us a glimpse into her soul.

It was chilling.

We now know that when Secretary Clinton met the plane carrying the bodies of the four Americans who died at Benghazi that the Obama administration had intially lied about what happened.

She stood over the flag-draped coffins of four dead Americans knowing that the first narrative blamed their deaths on an Internet video, which caused a demonstration outside the consulate to turn into a deadly attack, when she already knew the truth.

She looked into the eyes of the families of the fallen heroes knowing all about that.

She always knew they died from a planned terrorist attack from an Al Qaeda-like group. That’s what she told her family and foreign leaders according to newly released emails.

So why support the false narrative at the start? Because the Obama administration had an election to win eight weeks later, and a terrorist attack that killed four Americans didn’t fit into that plan.

President Obama asked voters to reelect him because he had killed Usama bin Laden. Al Qaeda was on the ropes. Qaddafi was dead and the Libyan war a success. The wave of war was a receding. President George W. Bush’s War on Terror was over because Obama and Clinton had won it.

A terrorist attack that killed Americans at Benghazi did not fit into that campaign narrative, so it had to be retold and spun into a different story. It wasn’t radical Islamist terrorists, but a spontaneous demonstration that got out of control in reaction to an obscure Internet video.


Instead it was — and still is — about character. And Secretary Clinton has been found wanting.

The even greater tragedy is Secretary Clinton doesn’t think she did anything wrong. In today’s Washington integrity and truth telling — even to mourning families — take a backseat to the relentless pursuit of power.

No wonder the rest of the country wants to throw all the bums out.”

Likewise, K. T. McFarland spoke on the Lou Dobbs show to illustrate the many ways that Clinton (like her word-parsing husband) lied.  From within hours of the attack, she told her family that the attack was perpetrated by terrorists.  Nonetheless, Clinton went to the American people and announced that it was a response to an amateurish video.  Then Clinton went to the grieving families and told them the same lie.

Hillary, the Muddler

In a 23 October broadcast, CBN news pointed out the testimony on the letters:

The committee pressed Clinton for answers to many questions, such as why was the United States in Libya? Why were security requests denied? And why was she willing to tell everyone but the American people that this was a terrorist attack?

One of the most revealing moments came when Republican Rep. Jim Jordan questioned Hillary about the explanations she gave in the first 24 hours following the attack.

“At 10:08, on the night of the attack, you released this statement, ‘Some have sought to justify the vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet,’ Jordan said.

Yet even though she led the American people to believe an anti-Islamic video was the motivation for the attack, she told her family, the president of Libya, and the prime minister of Egypt a different story.

“The next day, within 24 hours, you had a conversation with the Egyptian prime minister. You told him this: ‘We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest,” Jordan charged.

“Why didn’t you tell the American people exactly what you told the Egyptian prime minister?” he asked.

Clinton defended her statements, saying she was careful with her wording to the American people about what happened at Benghazi, saying, “some have sought to justify” that the video, not terrorism, was the reason for the attack.

To me, this seems very much like the parsing of words that gave Mr. “Depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is” Clinton his moniker.

“I was very careful in saying that ‘some have sought to justify,'” Clinton said. “None of us can speak to the individual motivations of those terrorists who overran our compound and who attacked our CIA annex. There were probably a number of different motivations.”

But analysts like Terry Jeffrey, editor of Cybercast News Service, questions whether Clinton intentionally misled America into thinking it was a protest over a video and not a terror attack.

Bible Input

As discussed in the post on lies and untruths, the Bible may present God’s approval of those who told untruths that defended the lives (Exodus 1:17; Joshua 2:9).  However, for those who lie to further their own will, there is nothing but condemnation (Proverbs 12: 22; Leviticus 19:11; Psalm 5:6; and others).